But she's happy to keep all the unearned privileges she holds. I don't see women en mass protest for family-court reform, selective service for women (or alternatively to revoke their right to vote), outlawing male genital mutilation, revoking everything Duluth and all the other things that feminism brought to our world.
She may not like what modern feminism does to her prospects right now, but she is not ashamed or even aware of all the the things she enjoys every day that have corroded gender relations for decades.
I think the number of women that will take the "offer" just to be able to vote, would be negligable. They'll go back trying to control the vote through their husbands.
But she's happy to keep all the unearned privileges she holds. I don't see women en mass protest for family-court reform, selective service for women (or alternatively to revoke their right to vote), outlawing male genital mutilation, revoking everything Duluth and all the other things that feminism brought to our world.
She may not like what modern feminism does to her prospects right now, but she is not ashamed or even aware of all the the things she enjoys every day that have corroded gender relations for decades.
So, I'm with Impossible on this.
The better of the two options by far. All playing soldier does is ruin their joints (knees, hips, back) and get them and the men around them killed.
I think the number of women that will take the "offer" just to be able to vote, would be negligable. They'll go back trying to control the vote through their husbands.