I think that's part of the reason why it might be higher than people expect. When you segregate approval by gender, the divisions are startling. For example, why were there statics that Trump had 20% approval among blacks? Because when blacks are broken down by gender, black men give Trump a 45% approval rating, and black women give Trump a 2% approval rating.

Trump represents a kind of brash, confident, masculinity. He embodies a confident strong-man. Men who might be attracted to that masculinity. He effectively has an edge with some gays. Black men have had genuinely toxic forms of masculinity being thrown in their face for decades now, and Trump is just a less toxic form of what they're used to.

On the other hand, the people Trump does worst with are entitled and privileged women who see the state as their current protector, while they themselves are surrounded by weak men. They want security in the form of more provisions by their sugar daddy, which is what the government effectively becomes. Upper-middle-class unmarried suburban white women embody that privilege, but so do all economic levels of black women due to racial protection racketeering by Democrats.

Neither understand that the government can't be a good provider, and what they need more than anything is a strong man for themselves. The only way that can happen is if Trump breaks the dependency and entitlement system they are used to, so that men can step in and take their natural place as providers.

This kind of confirms by suspicions that something has gone horribly wrong in they gay community, and that a swath of gay men aren't gay, but are actually straight men who have been conditioned to have a warped understanding of how to value themselves, and have tried to embody femininity to the point of homosexuality as a way to give themselves social and sexual value.

It's a long argument to explain, but to summarize it: straight men find femininity attractive. Gay men find masculinity attractive. If a gay man finds femininity attractive, he may not be as gay as the thinks.

As a result, I think there's a swath of genuine masculine attracted gays that find a masculine persona like Trump attractive, even without him being a provider to them. I'd argue that if it weren't for the amount of psychological abuse and conditioning in gay communities that promotes anti-Trump propaganda as a moral & social value, and if it weren't for the fact that there were a swath of the gay community that was made up of confused straight men, most of the gay male community would be supportive of Trump.