Civic nationalism seems to have a fatal flaw. It supersedes natural factionalism with manufactured political factionalism, leaving natural issues to bubble under the surface.
Have heterogeneous patriots ever secured their future?
This is already a civil war between whites with white nationalists joining the dems, so I don't know how you plan to coalesce a white identity. Racialization is a leftist tool for atomization. Falguni Sheth wrote an instruction manual for it called Toward a Political Philosophy of Race. There isn't a class struggle or racial conflict. It is a political conflict and religious crusade against the memetic, entropic forces of nature that wear down civilization like rivers carve canyons. Democracy was a mistake.
White identity already has a character and a coalescence. It just doesn't play well in areas dominated by the 2% or the 13%, because it's suicidal due to their tactics. Reasoned debate is a nonstarter. When reasoned debate is allowed, racial differences and how best to solve them can be productive topics. There was a whole movement on how to peaceably subsidize the relocation of our uncastrated, unassimilable black slaves. It died with Lincoln, though.
No, that's just the twitterverse. Talk to a white person who isn't afraid of repercussion, and they understand. They'll tolerate the mexican neighbor because they try to be good, but they see the shitty yard and unpainted house. They'll tolerate the black neighbor, but when shit goes missing, that's where they'll look, and they're right more often than not. White people, at their basic level, are reasonable. That's their identity. The pantifa outliers aren't representative of anything but Bolshevik tactics.
Civic nationalism seems to have a fatal flaw. It supersedes natural factionalism with manufactured political factionalism, leaving natural issues to bubble under the surface.
Have heterogeneous patriots ever secured their future?
This is already a civil war between whites with white nationalists joining the dems, so I don't know how you plan to coalesce a white identity. Racialization is a leftist tool for atomization. Falguni Sheth wrote an instruction manual for it called Toward a Political Philosophy of Race. There isn't a class struggle or racial conflict. It is a political conflict and religious crusade against the memetic, entropic forces of nature that wear down civilization like rivers carve canyons. Democracy was a mistake.
White identity already has a character and a coalescence. It just doesn't play well in areas dominated by the 2% or the 13%, because it's suicidal due to their tactics. Reasoned debate is a nonstarter. When reasoned debate is allowed, racial differences and how best to solve them can be productive topics. There was a whole movement on how to peaceably subsidize the relocation of our uncastrated, unassimilable black slaves. It died with Lincoln, though.
You must not be paying attention because the predominant white identity is antifa. All they can talk about is being white.
No, that's just the twitterverse. Talk to a white person who isn't afraid of repercussion, and they understand. They'll tolerate the mexican neighbor because they try to be good, but they see the shitty yard and unpainted house. They'll tolerate the black neighbor, but when shit goes missing, that's where they'll look, and they're right more often than not. White people, at their basic level, are reasonable. That's their identity. The pantifa outliers aren't representative of anything but Bolshevik tactics.