While starting a family is an excellent idea, and one that often leads to happiness, it is not a moral perogative. A state-enforced family, implicitly or explicitly, is no family at all. Forcing that decision onto someone, male or female, leads to long term unhappiness.
As for the semantics of wealth, in this context it is short-hand for well-being. By denying a citizen the right to vote, you are taking wealth away from them. Based on your previous posts, it sounds like the purpose of this is in service to the nation. Ergo, you sacrifice the wealth of the individual for the wealth of the nation.
While starting a family is an excellent idea, and one that often leads to happiness, it is not a moral perogative. A state-enforced family, implicitly or explicitly, is no family at all. Forcing that decision onto someone, male or female, leads to long term unhappiness.
As for the semantics of wealth, in this context it is short-hand for well-being. By denying a citizen the right to vote, you are taking wealth away from them. Based on your previous posts, it sounds like the purpose of this is in service to the nation. Ergo, you sacrifice the wealth of the individual for the wealth of the nation.
This violates the people's individual freedom.
That's authoritarian.
What did I misrepresent?