The problem is that “normies” won’t ever use Bitchute, and places like Twitter and Reddit, like to suspend or block Bitchute links. At the end of the day content creators need viewers, and the media is working overtime to demonize any alternatives.
Actual hacked material I can see, that sort of thing really doesn't need to be "monitized content", but if the TOS forbids reporting on such things, then that is absolutely suppression of the press. Imagine if nobody on YouTube was allowed to report on any government leaks or whistleblowers?
Although we already see what they looks like, nobody is allowed to question Obama yet every quarter truth and fake leak is entirely permissable against Trump.
Yeah, and then the same people who enact these bans on leaked material will whine about how freedom of the press only applies when a government is “suppressing” it. I put suppressing in quotes, because they count calling out their lies or misrepresentations of the truth out for what they are as an attack on freedom. A free press is important, but we practically don’t have one, because all of the mainstream normy ones are in bed with each other, while calling independent media far right.
BitChute link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/e2fH9V8EcTI/
Time for them to post stuff to BitChute then, and other alternative platforms.
The problem is that “normies” won’t ever use Bitchute, and places like Twitter and Reddit, like to suspend or block Bitchute links. At the end of the day content creators need viewers, and the media is working overtime to demonize any alternatives.
We need a new round of Trust Busting. Corporate Cancel culture is essentially bullying advertisers away from competitors.
Actual hacked material I can see, that sort of thing really doesn't need to be "monitized content", but if the TOS forbids reporting on such things, then that is absolutely suppression of the press. Imagine if nobody on YouTube was allowed to report on any government leaks or whistleblowers?
Although we already see what they looks like, nobody is allowed to question Obama yet every quarter truth and fake leak is entirely permissable against Trump.
Yeah, and then the same people who enact these bans on leaked material will whine about how freedom of the press only applies when a government is “suppressing” it. I put suppressing in quotes, because they count calling out their lies or misrepresentations of the truth out for what they are as an attack on freedom. A free press is important, but we practically don’t have one, because all of the mainstream normy ones are in bed with each other, while calling independent media far right.