These are the types of absolute morons that are actually running cities and states. They can't even put together how damn near legally impossible it would be to prove a case if they were to actually have this come to fruition. It would a monumentally huge waste of tax dollars for anyone to seriously attempt to litigate such a case.
The very first problem you would run into is actual data that irrefutably proves that all types of "masks" -- and the way people use them -- are demonstrably effective in the prevention of spreading or obtaining of the virus -- which is a nearly impossible task.
I don't doubt that when used correctly -- and that's key -- masks or covering are somewhat effective in reducing airborne particulates that may be present when engaging out in public, but I sincerely doubt extended, unwashed, repetitive use of any cloth covering would be particularly effective in preventing infection.
These are the types of absolute morons that are actually running cities and states. They can't even put together how damn near legally impossible it would be to prove a case if they were to actually have this come to fruition. It would a monumentally huge waste of tax dollars for anyone to seriously attempt to litigate such a case.
The very first problem you would run into is actual data that irrefutably proves that all types of "masks" -- and the way people use them -- are demonstrably effective in the prevention of spreading or obtaining of the virus -- which is a nearly impossible task.
I don't doubt that when used correctly -- and that's key -- masks or covering are somewhat effective in reducing airborne particulates that may be present when engaging out in public, but I sincerely doubt extended, unwashed, repetitive use of any cloth covering would be particularly effective in preventing infection.