We see this in modern politics all the time. Politicians who take away healthcare are just doing their jobs, while those protesting against them for making medication unaffordable are framed as uncivil and dangerous. It’s disingenuous to claim that both sides are equally at fault; one group is championing civil rights or access to healthcare while the other is looking out for their own interests.

laughs in Title IX challenge.

So fucking hypocritical. The right to a fair trial is a human right recognized by all NGOs, yet women are directly fighting against men being given that right. Fuck the ACLU, SPLC and all the other pathetic organizations who challenge human rights.

I choose white morality then, thanks.

Or the sightings of police officers kneeling alongside protesters, a scene reminiscent of redemption arcs of anti-heroes, except in this case it’s often alleged to be a publicity stunt before the police brutality begins again. Defense of the police and their violence appeals to our familiarity with the paradigms of gray in many stories about moral ambiguity, as well. It’s akin to a shield of incorruptibility: Good people can do bad things sometimes, without being immoral themselves.

BLM is still a women's movement.

While I also don't like stories where everybody is equally shit, which begets grimdark induced apathy, the author seems more worried that morally ambiguous tales might pooh pooh his worldview where he's the valiant hero stomping chuds into the ground.