You don't give professional victims martyrdom, you fucking moron. If you think violence is the answer, you have to research more on how these freaks operate.
You don't give them justification for the false victim act. You have to draw them out of their motte and bailey arguments and force them to state their true goals. You win by getting them to admit their hatred and using their own ideas of "hate speech" against them. You win by disproving the ridiculous idea that feminists are good people.
2020 is definitely a fight for our human rights. Trump must win or we're all fucked.
Because this idiot's actions have given them all the justification they need to censor us entirely.
You are painting with a lot of broad and diverse brushstrokes. And I just don't see anything in this story relative to the amount of energy you are investing in it.
I'm honestly lost for words. We were fucking winning and someone does this?
Does God just want women to rule over us all, torturing us for every minute of our lives? It's starting to seem like it. Every moment we take a step towards defeating them, some useless fuck either turns traitor (Looking at you BoJo.) or gets violent.
Are you familiar with Gell-Mann amnesia? Because you seem to be suffering from it.
“Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray’s case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the “wet streets cause rain” stories. Paper’s full of them.
In any case, you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story, and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate about Palestine than the baloney you just read. You turn the page, and forget what you know.”
– Michael Crichton (1942-2008)
The judge on the female Epstein case had an assassin sent to her house. Everyone knows that actual Epstein was assassinated.
Then when you hear the explanation that he totally hated women, you forget that it was an assassin sent to intimidate the judge on the case that can put away very powerful people.
Because the CIA can stage an assassination, but apparently they can't write a fucking note.
You think he's a CIA agent? Seems a little farfetched. Why would they want someone who knew about and fought the culture that oppressed men, considering their love for Democrats.
Unless you're claiming he's a patsy. I could believe that, but the truth doesn't really matter. The story is "MRA kills someone" and the female supremacists will run to Facebook and say "See, we told you they're violent, censor them now."
He's saying the note could have been planted. Either way we will never ever reach the perfect optic utopia that you wish for. It's not a viable solution when you don't control the media.
An "anti-feminist" went crazy and shot someone. This is literal gold for them and they know it. A justification for censorship, for everything they need to extinguish our hopes at being treated like humans.
Yeah, I'm not buying what the Alphabet Agencies are selling.
If he had so many victims listed down, why did he kill himself
Because "the hit list" is as fictional as feminist empathy for men.
Just like Maya McKinney's "transition". The last woman to go postal just happened to be "male."
His handler had him killed a la Jack Ruby.
This useless dipfuck just set us back heavily.
You don't give professional victims martyrdom, you fucking moron. If you think violence is the answer, you have to research more on how these freaks operate.
You don't give them justification for the false victim act. You have to draw them out of their motte and bailey arguments and force them to state their true goals. You win by getting them to admit their hatred and using their own ideas of "hate speech" against them. You win by disproving the ridiculous idea that feminists are good people.
2020 is definitely a fight for our human rights. Trump must win or we're all fucked.
Why are you going off like this?
Because this idiot's actions have given them all the justification they need to censor us entirely.
You are painting with a lot of broad and diverse brushstrokes. And I just don't see anything in this story relative to the amount of energy you are investing in it.
www.usefulvidiots.com
What do you mean? The story is that a prominent anti-feminist lawyer just killed someone. That's the justification they need to drop the hammer on us.
I'm honestly lost for words. We were fucking winning and someone does this?
Does God just want women to rule over us all, torturing us for every minute of our lives? It's starting to seem like it. Every moment we take a step towards defeating them, some useless fuck either turns traitor (Looking at you BoJo.) or gets violent.
Are you familiar with Gell-Mann amnesia? Because you seem to be suffering from it.
The judge on the female Epstein case had an assassin sent to her house. Everyone knows that actual Epstein was assassinated.
Then when you hear the explanation that he totally hated women, you forget that it was an assassin sent to intimidate the judge on the case that can put away very powerful people.
Because the CIA can stage an assassination, but apparently they can't write a fucking note.
You think he's a CIA agent? Seems a little farfetched. Why would they want someone who knew about and fought the culture that oppressed men, considering their love for Democrats.
Unless you're claiming he's a patsy. I could believe that, but the truth doesn't really matter. The story is "MRA kills someone" and the female supremacists will run to Facebook and say "See, we told you they're violent, censor them now."
He's saying the note could have been planted. Either way we will never ever reach the perfect optic utopia that you wish for. It's not a viable solution when you don't control the media.
You seem unhinged about this topic and I'm not seeing how most of what you are railing about is connected to this article.
An "anti-feminist" went crazy and shot someone. This is literal gold for them and they know it. A justification for censorship, for everything they need to extinguish our hopes at being treated like humans.