Oh look, X is awash with a story about the F-35 again.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
Comment Reported for: Rule 3 - Harassment
This is not sufficient enough of an insult to be a rule violation
And that crybaby faggot is still throwing reports around because I reply to a comment in the same chain as him.
For context, I BTFO'd whiny anti-christian anti-american catothecuckold so hard that he spammed so many reports that this absentee mod decided he needed a special rule disallowing me from replying to him, just to clear up his report queue.
Because cato is too much of a little bitch to hit the block button. Despite being part of the brigade that constantly cries about mods not letting him sperg out without limits.
Well, now it's getting closer harassment. Just don't interact with users you don't want to.
You trying to create special individual rules to protect that faggot from being challenged on his ignorant bullshit is ridiculous. And you said that I'm not allowed to reply to him - which I didn't. Not that I'm barred from speaking the truth.
The point of my original post ITT wasn't cato, it was challenging ghostfox's assertion that insulting someone invalidated their claim, which is laughable. It wasn't an interaction with your pet dimwit.
Him spamming reports at me for disagreeing with him is harassment of boh of us and hypocrisy.
My reply to your modpost was mocking you both, for this ridiculous special rule you've given him that makes the twit think he can get me removed for having the audacity to post in the same thread. But it was also true, and it was in response to your and his actions. If it was unprompted it would be harassment, if I was making unprompted threads talking about him or something that would be harassment - which he has done about myself and other users IIRC, and I have not.