You trying to create special individual rules to protect that faggot from being challenged on his ignorant bullshit is ridiculous. And you said that I'm not allowed to reply to him - which I didn't. Not that I'm barred from speaking the truth.

The point of my original post ITT wasn't cato, it was challenging ghostfox's assertion that insulting someone invalidated their claim, which is laughable. It wasn't an interaction with your pet dimwit.

Him spamming reports at me for disagreeing with him is harassment of boh of us and hypocrisy.

My reply to your modpost was mocking you both, for this ridiculous special rule you've given him that makes the twit think he can get me removed for having the audacity to post in the same thread. But it was also true, and it was in response to your and his actions. If it was unprompted it would be harassment, if I was making unprompted threads talking about him or something that would be harassment - which he has done about myself and other users IIRC, and I have not.