What would moving the channel ownership even do for him? If he is still in the UK, they will still lock his ass up for things he says. If the goal is to avoid prosecution/persecution, he needs to move himself.
That's what I thought. It would be like an American coming to the UK, saying something illegal and then attempting to claim that as they're American, they're not under UK jurisdiction and can say whatever they like. I suspect judges would throw that argument out in a second.
Either that or he's found a loophole in a law that is now ripe for exploitation (I suspect it won't wash).
What would moving the channel ownership even do for him? If he is still in the UK, they will still lock his ass up for things he says. If the goal is to avoid prosecution/persecution, he needs to move himself.
That's what I thought. It would be like an American coming to the UK, saying something illegal and then attempting to claim that as they're American, they're not under UK jurisdiction and can say whatever they like. I suspect judges would throw that argument out in a second.
Either that or he's found a loophole in a law that is now ripe for exploitation (I suspect it won't wash).