Ok, I've defended Fuentes before, but that tweet is about as charitable to his "opponent" as any other leftist would be, so fuck him for this retard take. If I wanted fake biased takes, I can just listen to Daily Wire, CNN, Democrats, or RINO war whores.
You aren't required to support Israel, you're required to not break the laws. If there were any other college riots going on that weren't Israel-related, I'd still be happy with deporting the participants and defunding the universities that allow it.
Thomas Massie and Trump have an ideological disagreement based largely on priorities. Massie is (rightfully) concerned about the national debt. Trump is concerned about being artificially hamstrung by budgetary constraints (unlike any other president) preventing him from getting stuff like deportations done. The situation is only tangentially related to Massie's lack of AIPAC handler.
There are laws that make it illegal to boycott isreal.
There shouldn't be.
Those are exclusively limited to preventing state agencies from awarding contracts to companies boycotting Israel. There's no law against any individual boycotting Israel.
The problem is that they're ONLY deporting a select few around their pet causes. Not foreign nationals who break the law for other reasons. If Trump said, "we're revoking the visas of foreigners who disturb the peace on college campuses," that's great. Instead it's always muh antisemitism. He could have taken the EXACT same action and framed it as America-first. Or just generally as anti-terrorist. Instead, he chose to present it as Israel-first. Why did he think that was the most beneficial optics?
Those are exclusively limited to preventing state agencies from awarding contracts to companies boycotting Israel. There's no law against any individual boycotting Israel.
When the fed gov becomes big enough and is a significant enough part of an industry that then becomes a de facto law preventing the what-should-be private sector from boycotting isreal.
Ok, I've defended Fuentes before, but that tweet is about as charitable to his "opponent" as any other leftist would be, so fuck him for this retard take. If I wanted fake biased takes, I can just listen to Daily Wire, CNN, Democrats, or RINO war whores.
You aren't required to support Israel, you're required to not break the laws. If there were any other college riots going on that weren't Israel-related, I'd still be happy with deporting the participants and defunding the universities that allow it.
Thomas Massie and Trump have an ideological disagreement based largely on priorities. Massie is (rightfully) concerned about the national debt. Trump is concerned about being artificially hamstrung by budgetary constraints (unlike any other president) preventing him from getting stuff like deportations done. The situation is only tangentially related to Massie's lack of AIPAC handler.
There are laws that make it illegal to boycott isreal.
You've never seen an actual riot, have you?
Universities shouldn't be funded by the federal government in the first place.
Oh yea? Who's your AIPAC handler?
The problem is that they're ONLY deporting a select few around their pet causes. Not foreign nationals who break the law for other reasons. If Trump said, "we're revoking the visas of foreigners who disturb the peace on college campuses," that's great. Instead it's always muh antisemitism. He could have taken the EXACT same action and framed it as America-first. Or just generally as anti-terrorist. Instead, he chose to present it as Israel-first. Why did he think that was the most beneficial optics?
When the fed gov becomes big enough and is a significant enough part of an industry that then becomes a de facto law preventing the what-should-be private sector from boycotting isreal.