We aren't talking about the media. We are talking about me and you. You said, in my interpretation, that I was assuming racial animus without proof because of my bias. I am now saying you are applying a animus based on a bias of yours.
I tried to give you a way out that made you look less foolish. It would be slightly less stupid if you were arguing "I'm saying this because the media would say this if the roles were reversed".
You said, in my interpretation, that I was assuming racial animus without proof because of my bias. I am knowing saying you are applying a animus based on a bias of yours.
Nowhere did I assert animus. Do you even hear yourself?
I tried to give you a way out that made you look less foolish. It would be slightly less stupid if you were arguing "I'm saying this because the media would say this if the roles were reversed".
You're peacocking.
Nowhere did I assert animus. Do you even hear yourself?
It's implied, or you just pointed out his religion, and ethnicity for the fun of it
I'm embarrassed for you. You're not normally retarded, and you're one of the least unpleasant people here, but you decided to make peak retardation the hill to die on. Very well then.
It's implied
It's nowhere implied.
or you just pointed out his religion
I didn't point out his religion.
and ethnicity for the fun of it
I pointed out his ethnicity because idiot German politicians led phony 'refugees' from this phony non-country into Germany, and by doing that, they have wrecked the place. It's got nothing to do with animus.
I'm embarrassed for you. You're not normally retarded, and you're one of the least unpleasant people here, but you decided to make peak retardation the hill to die on. Very well then.
I don't have a personal issue with you. I don't understand why you feel the need to attack me, personally. If suggesting you might have biases, like everyone else, is somehow insulting to you, I apologize.
And I know you personally didn't bring up his religion but it's written in the story you cited. I don't think you post willy nilly so you picked the article you most agreed with.
We aren't talking about the media. We are talking about me and you. You said, in my interpretation, that I was assuming racial animus without proof because of my bias. I am now saying you are applying a animus based on a bias of yours.
I tried to give you a way out that made you look less foolish. It would be slightly less stupid if you were arguing "I'm saying this because the media would say this if the roles were reversed".
Nowhere did I assert animus. Do you even hear yourself?
You're peacocking.
It's implied, or you just pointed out his religion, and ethnicity for the fun of it
I'm embarrassed for you. You're not normally retarded, and you're one of the least unpleasant people here, but you decided to make peak retardation the hill to die on. Very well then.
It's nowhere implied.
I didn't point out his religion.
I pointed out his ethnicity because idiot German politicians led phony 'refugees' from this phony non-country into Germany, and by doing that, they have wrecked the place. It's got nothing to do with animus.
I don't have a personal issue with you. I don't understand why you feel the need to attack me, personally. If suggesting you might have biases, like everyone else, is somehow insulting to you, I apologize.
And I know you personally didn't bring up his religion but it's written in the story you cited. I don't think you post willy nilly so you picked the article you most agreed with.