Not every issue. Australia was totally correct in keeping that anti-vaxxer tennis player out of the country. His sort of wrongthink is contagious and toxic. Millions would have died had they allowed him in the country to play tennis. If it saves just one life, curtailing all freedom is totally worth it. Why are people opposed to safety?
keeping that anti-vaxxer tennis player out of the country
Just nitpicking :
Expelling the unvaxxed tennis champion, after granting him authorization to come, then lying about it, and lying about what he said unpon arrival to defame his character to legitimize the unhinged border agents arresting him.
He was then expelled under a special power of the Immigration minister to deport any non-citizen for any or no reason whatsoever.
The court ruled that Novak Djokovic did nothing wrong, the ''reasons'' were bogus, but also that the Immigration minister has the power to deport any non-citizen without any reason.
Not every issue. Australia was totally correct in keeping that anti-vaxxer tennis player out of the country. His sort of wrongthink is contagious and toxic. Millions would have died had they allowed him in the country to play tennis. If it saves just one life, curtailing all freedom is totally worth it. Why are people opposed to safety?
Just nitpicking :
Expelling the unvaxxed tennis champion, after granting him authorization to come, then lying about it, and lying about what he said unpon arrival to defame his character to legitimize the unhinged border agents arresting him.
He was then expelled under a special power of the Immigration minister to deport any non-citizen for any or no reason whatsoever.
The court ruled that Novak Djokovic did nothing wrong, the ''reasons'' were bogus, but also that the Immigration minister has the power to deport any non-citizen without any reason.
Which begs the question, why are you opposed to safety and common sense measures to keep people safe?