I'm guessing the Ai was trained off of real-life kid photos? I don't think creating an AI that can take photos of kids and render them into porn is a safe thing. If it was anime shit or something then maybe the argument could be made that its not hurting anyone but if the pictures were based off realistic kids I think that's crossing a line.
I believe that particular case is already illegal, as you can't take a child's face and literally paste it on an adult nude body. Which means the core of the argument is already set up.
I don't think its a foolproof one though, as the company that let the AI be trained on such images would then end up on the hook for something too.
I'm guessing the Ai was trained off of real-life kid photos? I don't think creating an AI that can take photos of kids and render them into porn is a safe thing. If it was anime shit or something then maybe the argument could be made that its not hurting anyone but if the pictures were based off realistic kids I think that's crossing a line.
I believe that particular case is already illegal, as you can't take a child's face and literally paste it on an adult nude body. Which means the core of the argument is already set up.
I don't think its a foolproof one though, as the company that let the AI be trained on such images would then end up on the hook for something too.