yes Israel would treat them with preference because of their religion, but they need the citizenship papers in order to be a citizen. until then they are not citizens.
it's spelled out in black and white, I don't know how else I can Hammer this in.
You're arguing the letter of the law, while the rest are arguing the spirit. We see you as getting hung up on an irrelevant technicality when it's a barrier that doesn't fucking matter if you're Jewish. The letter of the law is you have to ask, but the spirit is that everyone who's Jewish is a citizen waiting to be recognized. We know this is true because they give the right of return to known pedophiles, anti-American spies, and worse.
Here's an analogy: it's like being the spoiled princess of a very wealthy man - she has no income or money in her name, but if all she has to do is ask her dad who'll give her anything, she's rich. Nobody would take you seriously when you're arguing she's not rich due to a technicality as she drives away in her hot pink BMW to go pick out her next set of $10,000 boots.
you missed my point about questionable loyalty.
but that's not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing that the source you cited about dual citizenship in the post title does not back your claim.
it's important that we are better than the journalists that inspired this forum, which means accurately citing sources.
If you can get citizenship on what is basically upon request, you have de facto dual citizenship, if not de jure.
yes Israel would treat them with preference because of their religion, but they need the citizenship papers in order to be a citizen. until then they are not citizens.
it's spelled out in black and white, I don't know how else I can Hammer this in.
You're arguing the letter of the law, while the rest are arguing the spirit. We see you as getting hung up on an irrelevant technicality when it's a barrier that doesn't fucking matter if you're Jewish. The letter of the law is you have to ask, but the spirit is that everyone who's Jewish is a citizen waiting to be recognized. We know this is true because they give the right of return to known pedophiles, anti-American spies, and worse.
Here's an analogy: it's like being the spoiled princess of a very wealthy man - she has no income or money in her name, but if all she has to do is ask her dad who'll give her anything, she's rich. Nobody would take you seriously when you're arguing she's not rich due to a technicality as she drives away in her hot pink BMW to go pick out her next set of $10,000 boots.