This has got to be one of the most morally depraved questions I’ve ever seen. Maybe he’s after justice. And the implication that crimes against children are somehow mitigated or should be ignored because they were committed more than a decade ago, is unconscionable.
Oh then I am sure this means that they are now okay with Roe v Wade which took place in 1973 to no longer be applicable? Wasn't expecting that from New Yorker
https://archive.is/xpO15
Another other part of this... did they have any objections to the circumstances around the E Jean Carroll case?
Oh then I am sure this means that they are now okay with Roe v Wade which took place in 1973 to no longer be applicable? Wasn't expecting that from New Yorker