I don't provide proof because this is an internet forum not peer-reviewed journal. I'm sorry if that's something you've literally never seen before, but everything I've seen on integration, immigration, and de-radicalization agrees that the 3rd generation of an immigrant family will have point where they will have to chose to fully assimilate, or completely reject assimilation and go back to the old ways. It's why we actually see more crime and terrorism from 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants than 1st.
Why am I now required to provide sources, when no one around me is willing to provides source material to claims of: "It is physically impossible for any African descendent person in any epoch of history to ever be capable of any civilizational development ever, even given infinite time". That's an insane claim that stands directly in the face of all known scientific and historical evidence, but I'm supposed to take it on faith 100% of the time.
Germans are white and generally have shared beliefs as anglo-westerners do
Not according to the Benjamin Franklin quote that WN's keep throwing at me. Many of them were Catholic, and non-British, which made them non-White. The English define White differently than the Americans, and Franklin was using the English concept.
I understand why people have a problem with multi-culturalism. I have a problem with multi-culturalism. I oppose it. That's why I talk about integration and assimilation.
You have a problem with my arguments because you are not willing to accept any of the same premises. Your ideology requires you to talk past me.
It would be no different then me talking to a Feminist. A Feminist would never accept that men are inferior humans who must be controlled for the prosperity of women. I can't argue that men should be treated fairly, or that marriage is a good thing under that premise. If I tell a Feminist that women are happier and more prosperous in marriage, like you, they would tell me that is completely hypothetical and unevidenced and dismiss it out of hand.
I don't provide proof because this is an internet forum not peer-reviewed journal. I'm sorry if that's something you've literally never seen before, but everything I've seen on integration, immigration, and de-radicalization agrees that the 3rd generation of an immigrant family will have point where they will have to chose to fully assimilate, or completely reject assimilation and go back to the old ways. It's why we actually see more crime and terrorism from 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants than 1st.
Why am I now required to provide sources, when no one around me is willing to provides source material to claims of: "It is physically impossible for any African descendent person in any epoch of history to ever be capable of any civilizational development ever, even given infinite time". That's an insane claim that stands directly in the face of all known scientific and historical evidence, but I'm supposed to take it on faith 100% of the time.
Not according to the Benjamin Franklin quote that WN's keep throwing at me. Many of them were Catholic, and non-British, which made them non-White. The English define White differently than the Americans, and Franklin was using the English concept.
I understand why people have a problem with multi-culturalism. I have a problem with multi-culturalism. I oppose it. That's why I talk about integration and assimilation.
You have a problem with my arguments because you are not willing to accept any of the same premises. Your ideology requires you to talk past me.
It would be no different then me talking to a Feminist. A Feminist would never accept that men are inferior humans who must be controlled for the prosperity of women. I can't argue that men should be treated fairly, or that marriage is a good thing under that premise. If I tell a Feminist that women are happier and more prosperous in marriage, like you, they would tell me that is completely hypothetical and unevidenced and dismiss it out of hand.