No. I'm gonna stop you right there. That is physically impossible. It is the most physically impossible thing that could ever be physically impossible. It's the Conservation of Energy Law. Even shit that we thought could break, broke before the Conservation of Energy. Free Energy has always been a fraud or a scam in every situation that it has ever been claimed. There are no exceptions in all of human history, nor anywhere in the observable universe, at any scale.
Could we travel instantaneously to different parts of the world for free.
No.
MH370
It crashed in the ocean one way or another. You ain't getting much more than that.
He's a physicist
Okay, so he knows he's a fraud and he's stealing money from people. Put him in jail.
Time Travel
Not in the way that you understand it because most people don't understand that time is just an axis of Spacetime. You live in 4 dimensions not 3. You can't separate time from space, because it's the same thing.
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
Zero-point energy isn’t even up for debate, the only question is how do we harness it. Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
Good on you for actually watching the video though
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
No... these concepts aren't even related.
Red-shifting and Blue-shifting is the doppler effect for light. That's all.
Red-shift isn't universal, some stars move away from us (red shift), while others are moving towards us (blue shift). The universe is universally expanding, but that's not a red shift. And all that that means is that the distance between atoms themselves is getting further.
None of that, literally none of that, has anything to do with the conservation of energy.
Zero-point energy... frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects, let alone the idea of "free energy". You can't change energy without work... that's literally what it means. We literally define it to mean that. That's what a change in energy is.
Listen, don't give this person your money. He is a criminal. He is lying to you. Don't give him your time and attention either, but definitely don't give him money.
Hubble's law, also known as the Hubble–Lemaître law,[1] is the observation in physical cosmology that galaxies are moving away from Earth at speeds proportional to their distance. In other words, the farther a galaxy is from the Earth, the faster it moves away. A galaxy's recessional velocity is typically determined by measuring its redshift, a shift in the frequency of light emitted by the galaxy.
frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects
Both demonstrate that the story of existence is clearly far more complex than those who cry “mUh fiRsT LaW” would seem to think is possible.
It’s funny how you frame your message so condescendingly but you don’t even seem to know much at all about the subjects. Have you really never heard of cosmological redshift? This is like 80 years old, everyone knows about it, basic stuff, in terms of cosmology atleast.
Newton's First Law isn't the same as the conservation of energy. It's related to it, but it's not the same. And again, red-shifting is a behavior, not a law. There is the Hubble-Lemaitre Law, but that's not the same as red-shifting. You are being bamboozled because someone is teaching you to conflate and confuse words and meanings.
"The story of existence" isn't defined by Newton's laws. Newton just created a system to explain kinematics by identifying it's simplest component parts. That system has held entirely true. We already know where Newtonian Mechanics falls apart, which is why Einsteinian Mechanics and Quantum Physics exists, but those fundamental laws do not actually change. It's only that the math context and assumptions Newton was using aren't sufficient.
No. I'm gonna stop you right there. That is physically impossible. It is the most physically impossible thing that could ever be physically impossible. It's the Conservation of Energy Law. Even shit that we thought could break, broke before the Conservation of Energy. Free Energy has always been a fraud or a scam in every situation that it has ever been claimed. There are no exceptions in all of human history, nor anywhere in the observable universe, at any scale.
No.
It crashed in the ocean one way or another. You ain't getting much more than that.
Okay, so he knows he's a fraud and he's stealing money from people. Put him in jail.
Not in the way that you understand it because most people don't understand that time is just an axis of Spacetime. You live in 4 dimensions not 3. You can't separate time from space, because it's the same thing.
The indisputably observed universal redshift (aka Hubble redshift) proves that energy isn’t conserved as the 1st “law” would demand.
Zero-point energy isn’t even up for debate, the only question is how do we harness it. Based on the evidence, it seems someone out there has harnessed it (see: Pentagon UFO disclosure movement)
Good on you for actually watching the video though
No... these concepts aren't even related.
Red-shifting and Blue-shifting is the doppler effect for light. That's all.
Red-shift isn't universal, some stars move away from us (red shift), while others are moving towards us (blue shift). The universe is universally expanding, but that's not a red shift. And all that that means is that the distance between atoms themselves is getting further.
None of that, literally none of that, has anything to do with the conservation of energy.
Zero-point energy... frankly I have no idea again what this has to do with the red shift of objects, let alone the idea of "free energy". You can't change energy without work... that's literally what it means. We literally define it to mean that. That's what a change in energy is.
Listen, don't give this person your money. He is a criminal. He is lying to you. Don't give him your time and attention either, but definitely don't give him money.
https://hubblesite.org/contents/media/images/4509-Image.html
Both demonstrate that the story of existence is clearly far more complex than those who cry “mUh fiRsT LaW” would seem to think is possible.
It’s funny how you frame your message so condescendingly but you don’t even seem to know much at all about the subjects. Have you really never heard of cosmological redshift? This is like 80 years old, everyone knows about it, basic stuff, in terms of cosmology atleast.
You are being bamboozled. Literally.
Newton's First Law isn't the same as the conservation of energy. It's related to it, but it's not the same. And again, red-shifting is a behavior, not a law. There is the Hubble-Lemaitre Law, but that's not the same as red-shifting. You are being bamboozled because someone is teaching you to conflate and confuse words and meanings.
"The story of existence" isn't defined by Newton's laws. Newton just created a system to explain kinematics by identifying it's simplest component parts. That system has held entirely true. We already know where Newtonian Mechanics falls apart, which is why Einsteinian Mechanics and Quantum Physics exists, but those fundamental laws do not actually change. It's only that the math context and assumptions Newton was using aren't sufficient.