I asked where the energy goes, you tell me the photons don’t go anywhere. Obviously. I’m talking about the energy contained in the photon. You realize you can have high energy photons and low energy photons right? The difference between infrared and gamma rays? I’m sure you’re aware of the concept. Cosmological redshifting is “lowering the energy of high energy photons” - the question I socratically put to you was “where is that energy going?”
If a car drove towards me, and the road kept on stretching between us so that the car would never reach me or atleast take longer to do so, the stretching of the road would violate the conservation of energy.
Doppler redshift != cosmological redshift that’s a low level mistake of comprehension. Cosmological Redshifting literally removes the energy from the photon and it goes “nowhere” according the the standard model.
If a car drove towards me, and the road kept on stretching between us so that the car would never reach me or atleast take longer to do so, the stretching of the road would violate the conservation of energy.
No, it wouldn't. That's the point. You might argue the stretching violates conservation (it doesn't, by the way), but not the car's energy or it's use thereof.
I asked where the energy goes, you tell me the photons don’t go anywhere. Obviously. I’m talking about the energy contained in the photon. You realize you can have high energy photons and low energy photons right? The difference between infrared and gamma rays? I’m sure you’re aware of the concept. Cosmological redshifting is “lowering the energy of high energy photons” - the question I socratically put to you was “where is that energy going?”
If a car drove towards me, and the road kept on stretching between us so that the car would never reach me or atleast take longer to do so, the stretching of the road would violate the conservation of energy.
Doppler redshift != cosmological redshift that’s a low level mistake of comprehension. Cosmological Redshifting literally removes the energy from the photon and it goes “nowhere” according the the standard model.
Read Carrol’s blog post
No, it wouldn't. That's the point. You might argue the stretching violates conservation (it doesn't, by the way), but not the car's energy or it's use thereof.
(It does by the way) - read what the actual cosmologist has to say, then get back to me.