My "musings" are far closer to something that could happen than yours of shutting off any and all immigration "until our countries are fixed and run by our own people." Realistically, both are relatively unlikely in the current situation though, unfortunately.
No, you're not getting it. You're trying to offer a solution which doesn't actually fix the problem, a solution which would require various institutions to be uncorrupted, when they're not, operated by people that have our best interests at heart, when the antithesis is true. The government, the H1B program, all of immigration into the West, our leaders, the NGOs facilitating the mass immigration, open borders, DEI policies, affirmative action and diversity hiring quotas, they're all corrupt, and their entire purpose and function now is to replace and genocide White people in our own countries. Your "solution" is bullshit and will never be implemented by the people in power.
Your solution also hinges on the idea that we even need uber intelligent immigrants in our White nation. That proposal is so astoundingly naive to the nature of IQ and the history of White nations as to be laughable on every level. White people have never, ever needed uber intelligent immigrants in order for our nations to function. We've never needed non-whites to "do the jobs we don't want to do", when we've done those jobs for millennia, on our own, by ourselves. White people have made almost every single advancement, invention, and break through for the last several thousand years. We don't need uber intelligent immigrants to do anything for us. We're our own uber intelligent people. Unless, of course, you're arguing with immigration purely from White nations, which I'd be mostly okay with, if the numbers were kept in check to not disposess the native Whites like is currently being done.
You're turning away people who are 99% on your side with your retardation.
What people? What retardation? Be specific.
I'm every bit as white as you, and yet in a couple of comments back and forth, you took "it would be best if we could let in like 100 geniuses and leave it at that" and turned it into "you're revealing your true feelings, that you revile white people." There is no universe where that isnt sperging.
Your solution, and every idea you've presented in this debate, has been in service to the plans of evil people who are actively genociding White people. Your solution is a compromise with evil people. No more compromises. If someone is trying to kill you, you don't compromise with them, you kill them before they can kill you. If someone is trying to rape your mother, sister, wife, or daughter, you don't say "well you can only molest them a little" to compromise with them. You stop the threat. If you're right, you don't compromise with fools or liars. Just because I can elucidate this fact and be specific in my arguments doesn't mean I'm "sperging". You only use that word because I vehemently disagree with you and your compromises with evil.
I understand it's a very important issue and things can get emotional, but holy shit come on.
"If you get emotional at the genocide of your race, you're a bad person." That's what you're saying. You're arguing identically to all the other White people still plugged into the system, who have been brainwashed by the propaganda and still believe it, who view hate and anger as inherently wrong, who think we should be emotionless apathetic pacifistic inactive robots in the face of our entire people's genocide. The proper response to what's happening is a nigh endless rage. However, my justified rage is underwritten in my comments, not overtly spoken. You're only claiming I'm being emotional because I disagree with you, and are making comments longer than a 1 sentence quip, which doesn't prosper a debate on this issue.
No, you're not getting it. You're trying to offer a solution which doesn't actually fix the problem, a solution which would require various institutions to be uncorrupted, when they're not, operated by people that have our best interests at heart, when the antithesis is true. The government, the H1B program, all of immigration into the West, our leaders, the NGOs facilitating the mass immigration, open borders, DEI policies, affirmative action and diversity hiring quotas, they're all corrupt, and their entire purpose and function now is to replace and genocide White people in our own countries. Your "solution" is bullshit and will never be implemented by the people in power.
Your solution also hinges on the idea that we even need uber intelligent immigrants in our White nation. That proposal is so astoundingly naive to the nature of IQ and the history of White nations as to be laughable on every level. White people have never, ever needed uber intelligent immigrants in order for our nations to function. We've never needed non-whites to "do the jobs we don't want to do", when we've done those jobs for millennia, on our own, by ourselves. White people have made almost every single advancement, invention, and break through for the last several thousand years. We don't need uber intelligent immigrants to do anything for us. We're our own uber intelligent people. Unless, of course, you're arguing with immigration purely from White nations, which I'd be mostly okay with, if the numbers were kept in check to not disposess the native Whites like is currently being done.
What people? What retardation? Be specific.
Your solution, and every idea you've presented in this debate, has been in service to the plans of evil people who are actively genociding White people. Your solution is a compromise with evil people. No more compromises. If someone is trying to kill you, you don't compromise with them, you kill them before they can kill you. If someone is trying to rape your mother, sister, wife, or daughter, you don't say "well you can only molest them a little" to compromise with them. You stop the threat. If you're right, you don't compromise with fools or liars. Just because I can elucidate this fact and be specific in my arguments doesn't mean I'm "sperging". You only use that word because I vehemently disagree with you and your compromises with evil.
"If you get emotional at the genocide of your race, you're a bad person." That's what you're saying. You're arguing identically to all the other White people still plugged into the system, who have been brainwashed by the propaganda and still believe it, who view hate and anger as inherently wrong, who think we should be emotionless apathetic pacifistic inactive robots in the face of our entire people's genocide. The proper response to what's happening is a nigh endless rage. However, my justified rage is underwritten in my comments, not overtly spoken. You're only claiming I'm being emotional because I disagree with you, and are making comments longer than a 1 sentence quip, which doesn't prosper a debate on this issue.