There isn't but the mixture of connotation and denotation is what Leftist thrives on. When they say "same species" it means far more than its definition and they intentionally do so to confuse language and muddy discussions on the topic.
and the breadth of variance among things like intelligence and physicality among phenotype groups is so wide it's not actually useful knowledge from a cultural perspective
That's like saying "you can never tell who is a tranny because a handful of cherry picked examples pass really well." Exceptions don't disprove generalized assumptions. Stereotypes are basic human instinct because we have thousands of years of them working well enough to be consistently selected to stay evolutionarily. Even if you could go your entire life having them proven wrong, most of the major ones we develop are right often enough to be valuable assumptions.
Also, manipulators and idiots abusing a concept doesn't disprove it or make it useless. That's gun grabber logic, we must simply reject the failed applications as they happen through actual thought instead of just going along with the flow.
I believe that the history of the US has shown that in localized environments these groups will tend to integrate well over time.
And I do not believe it has shown anything of the sort, in that these bonds are too fragile when they appear to be considered anything but temporary alliances based on concepts like mutual enemies (such as the Muslims post-9/11). And building our ideas on things like that is a chaotic and unstable idea. Leftism does it through Intersectionality and you can see how often the two sides break down and kill each other when it stumbles for even a second.
The Whites and the Natives where I grew up integrated rather decently across our history, but the primary pillar of that was pure hatred of the Federal government over the last century+. But even still, we have strong enough separations and differences that people can and do point them out and tribalize away from each other along them. One of my group of three growing up was primarily Native, and it caused numerous differences in him both physically and culturally that really couldn't be handwaved away as trivial or forgettable.
He wasn't identical to us, but that didn't mean inferior or superior either. He was just different and no amount of talking would change that. It was obvious enough as a child, growing up in a place that was severely anti-racist towards Natives due to our shared history, that we still noted it.
Even in one of the best examples in American history of two of the "major races" integrating, we were still demonstrably different on a level that came naturally to everyone to be aware of. The hatred of one another disappeared, but the separation did not.
There isn't but the mixture of connotation and denotation is what Leftist thrives on. When they say "same species" it means far more than its definition and they intentionally do so to confuse language and muddy discussions on the topic.
That's like saying "you can never tell who is a tranny because a handful of cherry picked examples pass really well." Exceptions don't disprove generalized assumptions. Stereotypes are basic human instinct because we have thousands of years of them working well enough to be consistently selected to stay evolutionarily. Even if you could go your entire life having them proven wrong, most of the major ones we develop are right often enough to be valuable assumptions.
Also, manipulators and idiots abusing a concept doesn't disprove it or make it useless. That's gun grabber logic, we must simply reject the failed applications as they happen through actual thought instead of just going along with the flow.
And I do not believe it has shown anything of the sort, in that these bonds are too fragile when they appear to be considered anything but temporary alliances based on concepts like mutual enemies (such as the Muslims post-9/11). And building our ideas on things like that is a chaotic and unstable idea. Leftism does it through Intersectionality and you can see how often the two sides break down and kill each other when it stumbles for even a second.
The Whites and the Natives where I grew up integrated rather decently across our history, but the primary pillar of that was pure hatred of the Federal government over the last century+. But even still, we have strong enough separations and differences that people can and do point them out and tribalize away from each other along them. One of my group of three growing up was primarily Native, and it caused numerous differences in him both physically and culturally that really couldn't be handwaved away as trivial or forgettable.
He wasn't identical to us, but that didn't mean inferior or superior either. He was just different and no amount of talking would change that. It was obvious enough as a child, growing up in a place that was severely anti-racist towards Natives due to our shared history, that we still noted it.
Even in one of the best examples in American history of two of the "major races" integrating, we were still demonstrably different on a level that came naturally to everyone to be aware of. The hatred of one another disappeared, but the separation did not.