Even if they let the player go lesbian, you know the only options will be a series of fugly dykes.
I’m never playing a game that expects me to role-play as a woman who is actively seeking male (or ugly female) affection. That shit is absolutely tranny adjacent.
Like the other commenters are saying probably the DEI power rangers but knowing how woke cdpr is now, I'm won't even bother to play. Besides I'm too sexist to play RPGs with female leads.
I don’t think people realize what’s about to happen here. As far as I know, every (major) rpg video game where the player is “trying to get laid” has either had a fixed male protagonist or create a character. Witcher 4 will be the first to feature both a fixed female protagonist and those romance options. It’s the first major studio release asking a super majority male audience to role-play as a woman navigating her intimate relationships. It’s super gay. And it will be made extra bad by the “available options” they will use to constrain your “choices”. They aren’t going to let you bang hot hookers or pursue sexy feminine witches.
Actually they probably will; look at Baldur's Gate 3 and Cyberpunk 2077. Those games managed to push the DEI messaging forward big time with all of the faggotry in them. Decent enough looking female characters who could engage in faggotry has almost everyone and their cousin defending those games. Even people here in this forum.
CDPR wants to push ESG forward, so they will let you bang hot women to push the faggotry angle because a ton of young porn-addicted men will find it "hot". At the same time, the "canon" romance will either be a tranny or some fugly black lesbian, because they hate lineages and nuclear families. And if the gameplay is just mediocre enough there will be a bunch of porn-addicted simps defending the game, and opening the doorway for even more degeneracy going mainstream in media.