So a bit of background. in the spiritual practice of alchemy, the philosopher's stone was a mythical element that when added to lead, would transmute it into gold, but would also transmute the alchemist into a supposedly perfect being.
I've long used this to make a philosophical point, because as we know today, gold is actually less dense than lead by atomic weight, so I would argue, sometimes it's not what we add, but what we remove that makes the difference.
Today, however, I went on a wild hair, wondering what if we took this advice literally, what might come up?
So I started by subtracting the atomic weight of gold from the atomic weight of lead, and searched for that, landing initially at beryllium, but beryllium is barely present in most people's bodys, so I went for a different angle and tried to see what elements in the human body have a total atomic weight of 9, and what came up was florine.
If you've ever come across arguments about fluoridation of drinking water, you're probably at least passingly familiar with sodium floride and it's use in drinking water. I could speculate further, but honestly, I want to see where this conversation heads.
I know next to nothing about chemistry, but shouldn't you look at the number of protons rather than the atomic weight? That determines what element it is. Atomic weight is the average weight of the various isotopes.
Lead has 82 protons, while gold has 79. If you managed to subtract 3 protons (lithium) from lead, you'd get gold.
Sure, but it would be gold 203. The alchemist transmuting a kilogram of lead into gold in such a way would never have to worry about bacterial and viral disease ever again, as ²⁰³Au has a halflife of ~60s, meaning he would be standing next to something giving more than 2.4*10^22 disintegrations per second. Each disintegration gives off on the order of magnitude of 1 MeV, yielding a total power of around 3 GW (or 1 ton TNT/s) for the moment the experimental setup stays together. In fact, such an alchemist would never have to worry about anything ever again.
You really can't remove protons from a nucleus. You can add them with a particle accelerator, which is how we get new elements, but going backwards requires an enormous energy release all at once.
honestly, it was just the first place my head went.
...3 is definitely a number that comes up a lot in religious/occult writings though...🤔
could just be related to pi, though, who knows?