I'm curious what people here think. I'm sure everyone here has seen the salt about Joe Rogan and how Kamala should have gone on his podcast (her team kept her off so she wouldn't show off how retarded she is to even more people) or how the left needs its "own Joe Rogan" (not possible because they would cancel it the minute it deviated from leftist orthodoxy). A lot of that is the left blaming everyone but themselves like they do every time they lose an election, but I kind of wonder if there's something to the theory. I don't listen to Rogan, but my understanding of his podcast is that politics isn't really the main focus and his listening base contains a lot of largely apolitical young men who are drawn it him because he talks about things they're interested in and doesn't shit on them like the legacy media does. If I'm a Joe Rogan listener who's not plugged into political stuff and I see Trump do a 3 hour interview for the podcast and see Kamala make excuses not to do the same, that's gonna leave me with a favorable impression towards Trump and make me more likely to vote for him. Since Rogan has 50 million listeners even a tiny percentage of them being moved from Kamala to Trump or not voting to Trump could move the needle.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
I don't know how much the rogan interview really did anything, his listeners were mostly trump people anyway.
IMO This election was an already baked cake. The obama-era insurrectionists failed to groom an heir and despite limping along through Biden for one more term they didn't have anyone they could cheat over the finish line when old age caught up to him.
But imo without musk buying twitter there wouldn't have been that preference cascade that gave normies permission to openly say to their wives and co-workers trump is just a better candidate.
That interview helped normalize supporting Trump in the mainstream.