It's needlessly simplistic to suggest that this is because of any one thing.
Overlooking for example the Kiev regime's attempt to wipe out native Russian speakers in the east of the country. Or that, following the rout in Afghanistan the Russians realized they had a crack at taking us down a peg. Twenty years of degenerating our combat doctrine by shooting desert rats and we weren't capable of taking on a peer in actual warfare.
Or hell, the part where the left has pissed away any economic advantage that the West once had to the point where the fortress economies of the world could take us on.
It's not just one thing. It's decades of failure, missed opportunities, unforced errors and feckless leadership.
Of course, but NATO seems to be Russia's big sticking point. If Ukraine gives up on that, suddenly they're back at the negotiating table hammering out the details of how this can be resolved, instead of blowing each other up.
No one will leave 100% happy, but that doesn't mean that tensions can't be lowered enough to end the conflict.
What is NATO? The military arm of clown world. The Russians have an issue if a nation directly bordering their most heavily populated areas joins a violent, oppressive, degenerate, socialist globalist alliance known for false flags and sponsoring terrorism and coups.
NATO wouldn't bother them if it didn't represent what it does.
It's true regardless of the subtext. Russia doesn't like NATO. There are many reasons for that.
Ukraine being allowed to join NATO is non-negotiable. Hence the war.
I don't think you disagree with me on this topic in any substantial way. Forgive me if you believe I've oversimplified anything just because I didn't write a five page essay with citations on a web forum.
It's needlessly simplistic to suggest that this is because of any one thing.
Overlooking for example the Kiev regime's attempt to wipe out native Russian speakers in the east of the country. Or that, following the rout in Afghanistan the Russians realized they had a crack at taking us down a peg. Twenty years of degenerating our combat doctrine by shooting desert rats and we weren't capable of taking on a peer in actual warfare.
Or hell, the part where the left has pissed away any economic advantage that the West once had to the point where the fortress economies of the world could take us on.
It's not just one thing. It's decades of failure, missed opportunities, unforced errors and feckless leadership.
Of course, but NATO seems to be Russia's big sticking point. If Ukraine gives up on that, suddenly they're back at the negotiating table hammering out the details of how this can be resolved, instead of blowing each other up.
No one will leave 100% happy, but that doesn't mean that tensions can't be lowered enough to end the conflict.
That's only true if you ignore the subtext.
What is NATO? The military arm of clown world. The Russians have an issue if a nation directly bordering their most heavily populated areas joins a violent, oppressive, degenerate, socialist globalist alliance known for false flags and sponsoring terrorism and coups.
NATO wouldn't bother them if it didn't represent what it does.
It's true regardless of the subtext. Russia doesn't like NATO. There are many reasons for that.
Ukraine being allowed to join NATO is non-negotiable. Hence the war.
I don't think you disagree with me on this topic in any substantial way. Forgive me if you believe I've oversimplified anything just because I didn't write a five page essay with citations on a web forum.