Because if so it feels like a lot of people are going full Gell-Mann and jumping on this screenshot because it fits with their own perceptions, in particular for this topic like Imp would do before even any info was released.
Copied from the other thread.
I read her manifesto. She was 15. Born female, not transgender. Her manifesto says nothing about nazism. Nothing about men. She just hated everyone equally because she was bullied in every school for being quiet, was despised by her own alcoholic/druggie parents, etc. She wanted to end humanity because she saw EVERYONE as scum in her words.
She idolized many male shooters in her manifesto. One of the people she idolized was a shooter who was openly Nazi, so I wonder if the media will create that narrative. Watch out for that.
She manipulated her father to buy a handgun, which she then stole from the gun locker at home. She had planned to kill herself but wanted to take out bullies first.
The manifesto releases themselves are questionable because there is confirmed fuckery going on either way. She seems to have been on an edgelord discord server, unless everyone involved is lying. The one who released this excerpt (in OP) is someone from the discord, who has access to unwatermarked versions of photos that Ngo and others are circulating. Someone else is faking DMs from this first person (1, 2 ). The intent could be variously to erase any connection to eceleb 'RadFemHitler', to incriminate the first person or else just fuck with people.
In any case the source of the bulk of the manifesto (Slatzism) is sus since the account holder is acting like an attention whore ('I would release it all but TOS uWu') and making definitive assertions which can't be supported, eg. connection to radfemhitler is 'confirmed fake', shooter is 'not non-binary' (yet she used the screen name 'Crossixir' and They/Them pronouns ). Basically troublemakers are involved in the evidence chain already and no proven non-retards have picked up the slack.
Also, I believe Slatzism is on good terms with RFH and the editor of a radfem-leaning news site (reduxx), so the potential for conflict of interest is obviously there.
Is this the random Discord screenshot Andy Ngo posted that doesn't seem to be in the full manifesto releases others are linking?
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/19A0tPFHRm/breaking-just-now--police-identi/c
Because if so it feels like a lot of people are going full Gell-Mann and jumping on this screenshot because it fits with their own perceptions, in particular for this topic like Imp would do before even any info was released.
Copied from the other thread.
The manifesto releases themselves are questionable because there is confirmed fuckery going on either way. She seems to have been on an edgelord discord server, unless everyone involved is lying. The one who released this excerpt (in OP) is someone from the discord, who has access to unwatermarked versions of photos that Ngo and others are circulating. Someone else is faking DMs from this first person (1, 2 ). The intent could be variously to erase any connection to eceleb 'RadFemHitler', to incriminate the first person or else just fuck with people.
In any case the source of the bulk of the manifesto (Slatzism) is sus since the account holder is acting like an attention whore ('I would release it all but TOS uWu') and making definitive assertions which can't be supported, eg. connection to radfemhitler is 'confirmed fake', shooter is 'not non-binary' (yet she used the screen name 'Crossixir' and They/Them pronouns ). Basically troublemakers are involved in the evidence chain already and no proven non-retards have picked up the slack.
Also, I believe Slatzism is on good terms with RFH and the editor of a radfem-leaning news site (reduxx), so the potential for conflict of interest is obviously there.