Yeah, that's what they say. But I really doubt that this is their priority. They wouldn't have undermined Assad for a decade if fighting ISIS was their priority.
Also, pretty much any time military conflict is engaged, there are multiple objectives. If you want to see who did not have a Rothschild majority owned central bank since 1935, just look where US has pointed its guns. I do think that's the single biggest factor. Obama's "JV" comment was kinda telling, but recently it's more plausible that continued US troop presence in Syria was focused on containing ISIS.
That doesn't say anything about potential clandestine operations, successfully hidden from the public.
Explain why you think they're there.
To prevent ISIS from controlling the oil fields, allowing them to continue being a major PITA.
Since Assad left, US has attacked known ISIS positions extensively.
Yeah, that's what they say. But I really doubt that this is their priority. They wouldn't have undermined Assad for a decade if fighting ISIS was their priority.
I don't think the two are mutually exclusive.
Also, pretty much any time military conflict is engaged, there are multiple objectives. If you want to see who did not have a Rothschild majority owned central bank since 1935, just look where US has pointed its guns. I do think that's the single biggest factor. Obama's "JV" comment was kinda telling, but recently it's more plausible that continued US troop presence in Syria was focused on containing ISIS.
That doesn't say anything about potential clandestine operations, successfully hidden from the public.