This paper examines the role of student facial attractiveness on academic outcomes under various forms of instruction, using data from engineering students in Sweden. When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades in non-quantitative subjects, in which teachers tend to interact more with students compared to quantitative courses. This finding holds both for males and females. When instruction moved online during the COVID-19 pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated in non-quantitative subjects. However, the beauty premium persisted for males, suggesting that discrimination is a salient factor in explaining the grade beauty premium for females only.
This sounds like one of those BS studies to me. Why would good-looking men and not good-looking women retain the advantage that is supposedly only due to their good looks?
Abstract:
This sounds like one of those BS studies to me. Why would good-looking men and not good-looking women retain the advantage that is supposedly only due to their good looks?
the article has info on that