Asking this because that’s why the feds are doing this to Alex Jones and it’s been so long that I honestly only remembered that because of the posts from earlier.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (114)
sorted by:
https://s.abcnews.com/images/US/abc_06_school_shooting_sandy_hook_nt_121215_16x9_1600.jpg
You mean this one?
Conspiracy retards literally just believe anything they are told. They will "question anything" except the very fucking gay shit they were told to think. Case in point, they will all say "no ambulances", but none of them actually checked it. They'll question every single tiny pixel of a photo for a 'defect' to 'prove it was a conspiracy', but they just believe wildly stupid shit that's completely full of holes and just make excuses/ignore all the flaws in their own narrative.
Because I don't care. I never took a position regarding this incident because I don't have time to investigate it. I read the comments just to check the talking points. I'm glad you posted a picture because it helps me see who is quick to lie. No need to insult me, it was a serious musing.
Upvote for a photo response. I know for a fact that Columbine was real. I lived a few blocks away when it happened. When I heard it on the radio, I hauled ass home to check on my kids. We had a house full of kids and my wife made them call their parents and their parents told them to wait at our house until they picked them up. Trust me, a lot of kids didn't wait around for the police to talk to them
The reason anyone came up with this 'no ambulances' shit is because the ambulances never go into a dangerous situation until the scene is safe.
Cops go in first and secure the area. Then ambulances.
There was even an entire thing in CHAZ/CHOP where an ambulance wouldn't go in because a guy got shot, Antifa wouldn't let the cops in, so the ambulance sat outside and made them drag the guy to the ambulance.
Alex Jones is controlled opposition anyway. They use guys like him to leak out snippets of real information coupled with lunacy. It allows them to link the lunacy to the real information and discredit the story. Michael Savage is another one of those guys. Wouldn't be surprised if John B. Wells is part of the crowd. Using discernment, one can typically find the truthful portions of the story
The most likely reason that conspiracy theories 'appear' out of nowhere and always are built around a suspiciously unified narrative, where people talk about it on websites that you can find on Google, websites hosted in the US that are never taken down, and why so many people can sell books and talk about conspiracy theory everywhere without any of them being drone striked, is likely that the government actually encourages, if not outright seeds the conspiracies themselves.
There's a reason every conspiracy seems surgically targeted to exactly one very specific demographic of people, and it just so happens to be the people who are the biggest threat to the government, and it just so so happens that as a result of these conspiracies, they're literally all paranoid out of their minds and scream "FED!" at anyone who says anyone should do anything besides cry on the internet.
I used to be in the conspiracy rabbithole but then I realized what a fucking gay waste of my time it was. It literally doesn't matter to anyone anywhere what anybody thinks about 9/11 conspiracy, because there exists no potential timeline where they'd ever get whatever imaginary 'vindication' they think they'd receive.
And even if they actually put in the effort to join the CIA or something, and got a guy 'on the inside' who managed to leak information, but the information said there was no real conspiracy, it actually was just pissed-off Arabs with planes, they'd refuse to believe him anyway.