Which is a distinction without a difference really. If all it takes to get a blank cheque to evade rules is use a direct link to a 3rd party site or filehost, and the text of your tweet spells out exactly what's under the link, then the rule is worthless.
This will come down to if he meant doxxing of Twitter users or doxxing on Twitter.
If he doesn't ban and claims it's the latter, I guess everyone can do whatever as long as they link it.
Which is a distinction without a difference really. If all it takes to get a blank cheque to evade rules is use a direct link to a 3rd party site or filehost, and the text of your tweet spells out exactly what's under the link, then the rule is worthless.