“Censoring on metacritic has gotten completely out of hand, not a smart move if you want to stay relevant aka in business coz this whole nwo/great reset/woke psyop has failed, narrative’s crumbling and everybody not bailing out in time will go down with it.”
This is the example given in the article on why we need them to tell us and not strangers on the internet ( the above quote is a metacritic review),
Which they claim gives no decent data on the game, but then if you need to enforce draconian measure to hide poison then you know the quality of the wrapping is CCP, haha
This brand of “criticism” extends to YouTube where content creators aren’t bound to any kind of journalistic integrity.
I did not know whores and scum had a standard of integrity, haha
Anyhow the only thing I might agree on is that if the production standards is high enough (or they are starved enough, haha) then people will swallow poison such as BG3 among other things.
BG3 had an excellent act 1 and it was entirely due to early access. Magically all the added gay shit even in act 1 wasn’t until after release. They didn’t even really make an act 3 worth playing and act 2 showed a massive decline in writing.
Act 1 was interesting and little to no woke crap, act 2 moved the story forward and an interesting setup but nothing wow except bringing back Jaheira - that I had to do a battle several time just to save her. Act 3 - was uninteresting, main story made no sense, the buildup was a letdown and I didn't even care about the game by the end. It didn't help that you hit max level way to fast in the game.
Ah, an interesting account. I actually borrowed the game on my brother's PS5 just to get a feel of the game, and I can sort of see where you are coming from. I think I had just gotten to level 4 or something and I had only reached the outskirts of the goblin stronghold while looking for the Githyanki creche. It's competently made, certainly, but I don't know if I will find it satisfying enough to ask him for some more rounds at the game.
This is the example given in the article on why we need them to tell us and not strangers on the internet ( the above quote is a metacritic review),
Which they claim gives no decent data on the game, but then if you need to enforce draconian measure to hide poison then you know the quality of the wrapping is CCP, haha
I did not know whores and scum had a standard of integrity, haha
Anyhow the only thing I might agree on is that if the production standards is high enough (or they are starved enough, haha) then people will swallow poison such as BG3 among other things.
BG3 had an excellent act 1 and it was entirely due to early access. Magically all the added gay shit even in act 1 wasn’t until after release. They didn’t even really make an act 3 worth playing and act 2 showed a massive decline in writing.
Act 1 was interesting and little to no woke crap, act 2 moved the story forward and an interesting setup but nothing wow except bringing back Jaheira - that I had to do a battle several time just to save her. Act 3 - was uninteresting, main story made no sense, the buildup was a letdown and I didn't even care about the game by the end. It didn't help that you hit max level way to fast in the game.
Ah, an interesting account. I actually borrowed the game on my brother's PS5 just to get a feel of the game, and I can sort of see where you are coming from. I think I had just gotten to level 4 or something and I had only reached the outskirts of the goblin stronghold while looking for the Githyanki creche. It's competently made, certainly, but I don't know if I will find it satisfying enough to ask him for some more rounds at the game.