“Censoring on metacritic has gotten completely out of hand, not a smart move if you want to stay relevant aka in business coz this whole nwo/great reset/woke psyop has failed, narrative’s crumbling and everybody not bailing out in time will go down with it.”
This is the example given in the article on why we need them to tell us and not strangers on the internet ( the above quote is a metacritic review),
Which they claim gives no decent data on the game, but then if you need to enforce draconian measure to hide poison then you know the quality of the wrapping is CCP, haha
This brand of “criticism” extends to YouTube where content creators aren’t bound to any kind of journalistic integrity.
I did not know whores and scum had a standard of integrity, haha
Anyhow the only thing I might agree on is that if the production standards is high enough (or they are starved enough, haha) then people will swallow poison such as BG3 among other things.
BG3 had an excellent act 1 and it was entirely due to early access. Magically all the added gay shit even in act 1 wasn’t until after release. They didn’t even really make an act 3 worth playing and act 2 showed a massive decline in writing.
Act 1 in all those types of games is always the most interesting part. You get to create your character, decide how to interact with quests, and meet and decide your party. Its got all the hooks and freshness.
Act 2 is usually always a slump because its just trudging through the choices you made hours ago while the plot has to take you forward in the necessary beats one way or another. While Act 3 has potential, it has to competently account for all the choices made along the way and very rarely do they put in that effort to have that much differentiation.
Mass Effect is a great example. First game has massive potential, second game is completely throw away, and the third tries to account for all the options but fails to do so.
This is the example given in the article on why we need them to tell us and not strangers on the internet ( the above quote is a metacritic review),
Which they claim gives no decent data on the game, but then if you need to enforce draconian measure to hide poison then you know the quality of the wrapping is CCP, haha
I did not know whores and scum had a standard of integrity, haha
Anyhow the only thing I might agree on is that if the production standards is high enough (or they are starved enough, haha) then people will swallow poison such as BG3 among other things.
BG3 had an excellent act 1 and it was entirely due to early access. Magically all the added gay shit even in act 1 wasn’t until after release. They didn’t even really make an act 3 worth playing and act 2 showed a massive decline in writing.
Act 1 in all those types of games is always the most interesting part. You get to create your character, decide how to interact with quests, and meet and decide your party. Its got all the hooks and freshness.
Act 2 is usually always a slump because its just trudging through the choices you made hours ago while the plot has to take you forward in the necessary beats one way or another. While Act 3 has potential, it has to competently account for all the choices made along the way and very rarely do they put in that effort to have that much differentiation.
Mass Effect is a great example. First game has massive potential, second game is completely throw away, and the third tries to account for all the options but fails to do so.