Atrocity propaganda (media.kotakuinaction2.win)

posted 12 days ago by btbw 12 days ago by btbw +81 / -4

90 comments download

90 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (90)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– ctrlshiftrightspace 4 points 11 days ago +4 / -0

Red Pill 3rd Edition Removed (pg 223) https://archive.org/details/red-pill-3rd-edition-removed/page/223/mode/2up

It's hard to search for complete version of the "Red Pill 3rd Edition"

Ch8 "Hitler" is a good read. Has some good points on Poland and it's relation to Weimar Germany in Ch7.

BTW, you are using a term coined by the tribe...the correct historical term is National Socialists or NatSocs.

It is always good to watch some David Irving videos before the hopelessness of WWII being a good war against the bad Germans.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -4 ▼

– Gizortnik -4 points 11 days ago +1 / -5

the correct historical term is National Socialists or NatSocs.

This is how fucking stupid you are.

First of all, no one would call them "NatSocs" or "Nat Socks" as a historical term in the 1920's-1940's. Even "National Socialists" was clunky for the written word. After all, thier real name was the NSDAP. Or, in german:

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei

Enhance.

Nationalsozialistische

Enhance.

Nationalsozialistische

ENHANCE!

Na ... zi ...

MOTHER OF GOD

IT WAS IN THE NAME THE WHOLE TIME

That is how fucking stupid you are.

Also, David Irving is an explicit liar.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– ctrlshiftrightspace 2 points 11 days ago +2 / -0

took about 2 seconds, you're welcome

Exposing the “Nazi” Epithet – Who started it, why, how, and who benefits

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– Gizortnik 0 points 11 days ago +1 / -1

It's literally in the name you idiot.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– ctrlshiftrightspace 2 points 11 days ago +2 / -0

It’s time to debunk the “Nazi” epithet, and to show you where it came from, who invented it, and why. The fact is, that the term “Nazi” was created by the enemies of the National Socialists (the NSDAP). It was a pejorative term; an insult or a slur. The Germans, not even Hitler nor any other top party officials ever called themselves “Nazis”! They called themselves “National Socialists” and nothing else. Those who can read German and have studied any of the original documents and speeches know this already, but most don’t.

Anyhow, you seem to think that your abbreviating national socialists using "NAZI," is not using a pejorative. Or did you intend to use the pejorative form of National Socialist?

Or all forms of "Nazi" are equal?

Asking for a friend

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?