Say it with me, folks: Access to white people is not a human right!
[Starting 45:39] So what's the plan? I'm interested to hear, are we going to stop Africans coming uh to Europe uh and for that matter to North America? We just going to build some enormous wall and keep them in sub-Saharan Africa? Is that the plan?
Uhm. While the meme answer is "Good idea," the more serious answer is that he's got this badly, badly reversed. It's not about keeping Africans in Africa, it's about enforcing our own countries' borders, in this case the UK. Africans can leave Africa. No one else is forced to let them in. Not accepting Africans to the UK would not be the same as imprisoning Africans in Africa.
If that's your plan, if you want to just keep the societies uh of what you could call the North as they are, stop any further shift from white to brown in the average complexion the average pigmentation, you have got to explain to me how that's going to work economically.
Muh economics!
There are a great many elderly voters in this country who want two incompatible things; they want to have no immigration and no inflation. Guess what? If you don't have any immigration - if you had had no immigration in the last 10 or 20 years - there would be much higher inflation today than there is, because the population the labor force would simply be much smaller.
OR YOU COULD STOP FUCKING PRINTING MONEY, STOP MASSIVE GOVERNMENT WASTE, STOP MASSIVE FOREIGN AID, ROOT OUT CORRUPTION, AND GENERALLY STOP BEING FUCKING RETARDED.
Also, under current immigration schemes, countries spend far more on managing immigration, than the "immigrants" add to the economy. Literally spending a ton of money to send these people back, and then keep them out, would save you money.
The inflation argument really pisses me off. Seriously, stop printing money!
So, this is, from an economic point of view, relatively straightforward. From a historic point of view relatively straightforward. There will be mass migration, there will be miscegenation, there will be more brown people. The question is what what are we going to do about it? Keeping the Africans out of the rest of the world is a doomed enterprise.
Only with that attitude. Enforcing borders has a much longer history than Africans leaving Africa en masse. This guy is a disingenuous retard "historian." Fuck him.
I'm interested to hear, are we going to stop Africans coming uh to Europe uh and for that matter to North America? We just going to build some enormous wall and keep them in sub-Saharan Africa? Is that the plan?
For a historian, his knowledge of geography is quite deficient. You don't need a 'giant wall' if you want to keep sub-Saharans out of America.
Uhm. While the meme answer is "Good idea," the more serious answer is that he's got this badly, badly reversed. It's not about keeping Africans in Africa, it's about enforcing our own countries' borders, in this case the UK. Africans can leave Africa. No one else is forced to let them in. Not accepting Africans to the UK would not be the same as imprisoning Africans in Africa.
You are free to leave your home, but you're not free to come into mine, let alone despoil and plunder it.
if you want to just keep the societies uh of what you could call the North as they are, stop any further shift from white to brown in the average complexion the average pigmentation, you have got to explain to me how that's going to work economically.
The arrogance. Just straight out admitting that they have been 'shifting the average complexion from white to brown', which no one asked for (not even tanning bed enthusiasts), and now they cry bloody murder over people wanting to stop further encroachments.
there will be more brown people
As a brown person, I think there's enough brown people as it is. Diversity in the world is actually nice. Do you really want a world without beautiful blonde women?
Say it with me, folks: Access to white people is not a human right!
Uhm. While the meme answer is "Good idea," the more serious answer is that he's got this badly, badly reversed. It's not about keeping Africans in Africa, it's about enforcing our own countries' borders, in this case the UK. Africans can leave Africa. No one else is forced to let them in. Not accepting Africans to the UK would not be the same as imprisoning Africans in Africa.
Muh economics!
OR YOU COULD STOP FUCKING PRINTING MONEY, STOP MASSIVE GOVERNMENT WASTE, STOP MASSIVE FOREIGN AID, ROOT OUT CORRUPTION, AND GENERALLY STOP BEING FUCKING RETARDED.
Also, under current immigration schemes, countries spend far more on managing immigration, than the "immigrants" add to the economy. Literally spending a ton of money to send these people back, and then keep them out, would save you money.
The inflation argument really pisses me off. Seriously, stop printing money!
Only with that attitude. Enforcing borders has a much longer history than Africans leaving Africa en masse. This guy is a disingenuous retard "historian." Fuck him.
For a historian, his knowledge of geography is quite deficient. You don't need a 'giant wall' if you want to keep sub-Saharans out of America.
You are free to leave your home, but you're not free to come into mine, let alone despoil and plunder it.
The arrogance. Just straight out admitting that they have been 'shifting the average complexion from white to brown', which no one asked for (not even tanning bed enthusiasts), and now they cry bloody murder over people wanting to stop further encroachments.
As a brown person, I think there's enough brown people as it is. Diversity in the world is actually nice. Do you really want a world without beautiful blonde women?
He's toeing the party line of neo-conservatives, together with his buddies McMasters and John Cochrane.