Isn't is also convenient that the naysayers always assume a 100% completion-day-one cost and rate? It's never "It's impossible to get 100% of the criminals, but lets look at the policy from the perspective of fixing the problem a few percentage points at a time", it's always "It's impossible to get 100% of the criminals, so why bother trying to stop even a single one of them?!"
Isn't is also convenient that the naysayers always assume a 100% completion-day-one cost and rate? It's never "It's impossible to get 100% of the criminals, but lets look at the policy from the perspective of fixing the problem a few percentage points at a time", it's always "It's impossible to get 100% of the criminals, so why bother trying to stop even a single one of them?!"