His loudest detractors are just people tired of the 1 dimensional sperging of bad faith arguments. He's single issue moreso than us noticers because he doesn't even address unrelated stuff. He will somehow make a woman the problem at a gay buttsex orgy
The loudest detractors comment (which in hindsight wasn't the best way to describe it) was referring to a handful of obvious pro-woman shills he regularly fought with. Some of them were noticers, some of them weren't. It didn't stop him from calling anyone who disagreed with him a stormfag either way.
The loudest detractors was referring to a handful of obvious pro-woman shills he regularly fought with
Having called him out quite a few times in the past for both his general spamming and anti-natalist stances do feel free to actually name those 'pro-woman detractors' and not turn out to be posting complete shit just like he does when claiming things like "ConPro/CuntPro" is always the reason for his downvotes rather than the fact he's unhinged and never stays on topic even when he's the OP of a thread.
How about Antonio? How about the other clowns who were more offended that he besmirched the name of the holy female than any of the things you complain about? You know, the ones who who make any criticism of a white woman out to be a Jewish conspiracy if they're the noticer type? That kind of opposition did more to boost him than anything he ever said or did.
claiming things like "ConPro/CuntPro" is always the reason for his downvotes
I've noticed myself that the difference between a universally upvoted anti-woman comment and one with half a dozen downvotes is whether it gets the attention of a pro-woman shill. His claims that he's being botted are unhinged and when he has tens of downvotes it's obviously organic, but he's not wrong that there's some fuckery going on. Just not as much as he says. Whether they're from ConPro I don't know.
Edit: Thanks for proving my point downvoters. You just can't help yourselves. Please try to remember this next time you call you call anything that contradicts your pro-woman shilling fake and gay if you have any shame at all.
His loudest detractors are just people tired of the 1 dimensional sperging of bad faith arguments. He's single issue moreso than us noticers because he doesn't even address unrelated stuff. He will somehow make a woman the problem at a gay buttsex orgy
The loudest detractors comment (which in hindsight wasn't the best way to describe it) was referring to a handful of obvious pro-woman shills he regularly fought with. Some of them were noticers, some of them weren't. It didn't stop him from calling anyone who disagreed with him a stormfag either way.
Having called him out quite a few times in the past for both his general spamming and anti-natalist stances do feel free to actually name those 'pro-woman detractors' and not turn out to be posting complete shit just like he does when claiming things like "ConPro/CuntPro" is always the reason for his downvotes rather than the fact he's unhinged and never stays on topic even when he's the OP of a thread.
How about Antonio? How about the other clowns who were more offended that he besmirched the name of the holy female than any of the things you complain about? You know, the ones who who make any criticism of a white woman out to be a Jewish conspiracy if they're the noticer type? That kind of opposition did more to boost him than anything he ever said or did.
I've noticed myself that the difference between a universally upvoted anti-woman comment and one with half a dozen downvotes is whether it gets the attention of a pro-woman shill. His claims that he's being botted are unhinged and when he has tens of downvotes it's obviously organic, but he's not wrong that there's some fuckery going on. Just not as much as he says. Whether they're from ConPro I don't know.
Edit: Thanks for proving my point downvoters. You just can't help yourselves. Please try to remember this next time you call you call anything that contradicts your pro-woman shilling fake and gay if you have any shame at all.