Maybe controversial opinion, if you don't care enough to come back to the country to vote, you don't care enough about the country for your vote to be given a shit about.
Like, I get working abroad sometimes might not be fully optional in certain careers but that's just how it is.
We know of course that's just a front for soliciting actual foreigners to vote, but the front shouldn't even be considered valid.
I don't think that's fair for people who, as you say, work abroad typically; or people who are military personelle and are deployed elsewhere.
I'm willing to concede that if you spend more than 50% of your time abroad or more, maybe you relinquish your voting rights in local elections and the like, but I'm not so sure that's a valid argument for state or federal elections.
The issue is about what your real investment is in your community. Locally, you're losing your investment locally. But if we're voting in federal elections (especially if the government is forcing you to go somewhere), I don't think that's valid.
I think if you are military personnel you are likely on something I'd consider American location, whether base or ship, which has direct line to America through government channels. I'd say that is a fine exception.
Anything else however, I don't think deserves to be given the risk nor extra effort.
I think I would be more comfortable with that argument if we had a National Voting Day holiday where people could more clearly take off from work and get travel and board back to the US much more easily. I feel like political parties would probably pay people to fly back in some cases, the same way they bus church groups to voting booths.
Maybe controversial opinion, if you don't care enough to come back to the country to vote, you don't care enough about the country for your vote to be given a shit about.
Like, I get working abroad sometimes might not be fully optional in certain careers but that's just how it is.
We know of course that's just a front for soliciting actual foreigners to vote, but the front shouldn't even be considered valid.
I don't think that's fair for people who, as you say, work abroad typically; or people who are military personelle and are deployed elsewhere.
I'm willing to concede that if you spend more than 50% of your time abroad or more, maybe you relinquish your voting rights in local elections and the like, but I'm not so sure that's a valid argument for state or federal elections.
The issue is about what your real investment is in your community. Locally, you're losing your investment locally. But if we're voting in federal elections (especially if the government is forcing you to go somewhere), I don't think that's valid.
I think if you are military personnel you are likely on something I'd consider American location, whether base or ship, which has direct line to America through government channels. I'd say that is a fine exception.
Anything else however, I don't think deserves to be given the risk nor extra effort.
I think I would be more comfortable with that argument if we had a National Voting Day holiday where people could more clearly take off from work and get travel and board back to the US much more easily. I feel like political parties would probably pay people to fly back in some cases, the same way they bus church groups to voting booths.
Most places have weeks of early voting. This argument is fake and gay