The number “1488” is a common symbol used among hate groups. The “14” is shorthand for the “14 Words,” a stand-in for a white supremacist slogan, while “88” refers to an abbreviation of “Heil Hitler,” since H is the eighth letter of the alphabet.
What are those fourteen words? Curious how they never say. Because they're innocuous...and correct.
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children
Sure. Their primary concern is that it lends legitimacy to the claim that white people will cease to exist and white children are in danger. I wouldn't agree with that if it were 1978. White people as a racial construct are not going to simply die out, that's not really a thing. However, there is rampant, systemic, anti-white discrimination at this point that endangers white kids and teaches them to hate themselves.
The saying itself is not much of a problem. All the other crazy shit before and after it is, and more specifically, the idea that the best way to protect white people is with socialism; well that's a special case of retard.
Socialism didn't protect Russia, Germany, or Britain. Imagine being fucking retarded enough to think that therefore Socialism would protect white people, when Socialism is actively destroying white people right now.
Sure. Their primary concern is that it lends legitimacy to the claim...
Frankly, fuck their concerns. I'm not going to for a single minute take the arguments of people who absolutely despise "whiteness" when it comes to whether or not white people should look after themselves. It's a bit of a conflict of interests, I'd say.
It's like the people who take every single instance of anything as proof that climate change is real, and they should push the agendas they already wanted to push. Or the disarmament squad, who will take any event as a sign they need to push the gun control legislation they already wanted to push.
They're not reliable or trustworthy, so frankly their concerns when it comes to white people is beyond worthless.
...the claim that white people will cease to exist and white children are in danger...White people as a racial construct are not going to simply die out, that's not really a thing.
I mean, I would have thought so too. Until you notice what they're doing to any and every "white majority" country (and I put that in quotes because they don't call black countries "black majority," or Asian countries "Asian majority," and the whole concept is a linguistic attack itself.) It's not going to be soon, but if white people aren't allowed to have anything for themselves, and any group of predominately or exclusively white people is deemed racist...over time, yes, "white people" will absolutely die out, or at least shrivel away to nothing. and once the numbers get low enough, probably get genocided actively even nearer to extinction. You just have to look at the trends to realize that, yes, white people are being shoved out, and that will at least potentially result in eventual near extinction.
However, there is rampant, systemic, anti-white discrimination at this point that endangers white kids and teaches them to hate themselves.
And, if white people aren't allowed to have an identity, but every other racial group is, and they're mostly trained to hate white people...yeah, whites aren't faring too well in that scenario.
The saying itself is not much of a problem.
Tell them that.
All the other crazy shit before and after it is, and more specifically, the idea that the best way to protect white people is with socialism; well that's a special case of retard.
Awwww shit, there you go again. One of my least favorite arguments. If you care about white people, you're a socialist and a leftist. Tiresome.
Socialism didn't protect Russia, Germany, or Britain. Imagine being fucking retarded enough to think that therefore Socialism would protect white people, when Socialism is actively destroying white people right now.
No one is calling for socialism. You just use that as a smear against people you don't like, to try to score cheap points. It's a shame, too. You're obviously a smart guy, and you're good on plenty of subjects. But this is just bullshit, and it annoys me every time you, and others using the same playbook, use that tactic.
If defending white people is socialism, what should white people do? Because you seem to just lump anything pro-white in with Nazism, and Nazism in with socialism (yeah, point, but it's a tad more complicated), and then with leftism. So basically, to you, any pro-white movement is inherently leftist, and thus inherently retarded. So do white people just die out, or what?
I'm a white person who cares about white people, and thinks they're under attack. What is an acceptable attitude or response?
It's not going to be soon, but if white people aren't allowed to have anything for themselves, and any group of predominately or exclusively white people is deemed racist...over time, yes, "white people" will absolutely die out, or at least shrivel away to nothing.
No, this is Progressive Nationalist doctrine. Even in the worst case you can politically imagine, stateless peoples exist regardless of political recognition. That isn't even remotely going to come to that.
One of my least favorite arguments. If you care about white people, you're a socialist and a leftist.
No, just the opposite. If your are a Leftist or a Socialist, then I know for a fact you don't care about American Whites. The same way a Feminist doesn't care about women, or a BLM activist doesn't care about American Blacks.
I'm a white person who cares about white people, and thinks they're under attack. What is an acceptable attitude or response?
Open and immediate confrontation against racialist bullshit. That's what I've done, even at work, directly to people's faces. I make it clear that under no uncertain terms I will respond to racialism with direct, open, immediate hostility and condemnation regardless of consequence. I will not tolerate it, and will not tolerate it being pushed onto my co-workers, nor any member of my team.
You don't tolerate it, you don't compromise, you set the tempo of the battle and you start it early. "But you could lose your job!" Good. Don't work for racist, Nazi, trash. If you are a good employee, then they don't deserve you, and better people should earn your labor.
And yes, that includes these fucking Black National Socialist terrorists talking about "racial equity" and "social justice".
Beyond that, take care of your neighbors, family, friends, and local community. Be the pillar of your community. If you really want to effect positive change for American Whites, then you need to check out what Booker T. Washington did for American Blacks.
And, again, I'm not trying to be mean, I don't dislike or disrespect you. I know you're a smart guy. I just thing you're on the wrong side of this, and disingenuous on this topic as well.
Even in the worst case you can politically imagine, stateless peoples exist regardless of political recognition. That isn't even remotely going to come to that.
Stateless people exist...but not as any sort of power. Stateless people exist...at the mercy of the State.
Again, they're after white people, in every white location. I know you know this. Over time, that will result in white people fading out. In any nonwhite location, whites are the outsiders. In any white location...well, our own governments are turning against us steadily, we have affirmative action against us, we often have all but "No Whites Allowed" signs. If the trend continues, that doesn't leave us anywhere at all pleasant.
US went from +90% white to ~60% in around a century. Many other "white majority" (again, linguistic attack on white countries, no one else is a "majority" country, they're just an Asian or black country, or whatever) followed the same trend. All power structures are against whites. There is no pro-white group with power really anywhere in the world. Almost any country that went from majority white to minority white basically genocided the white people there.
To act like it's impossible that whites get driven to utter irrelevance and put to the mercy of people who have declared their hatred of us means you're either not paying attention (which I know isn't true), or just don't want to admit it.
If your are a Leftist or a Socialist, then I know for a fact you don't care about American Whites.
Again, linguistics. You accuse anyone who says they're for white people of being socialist leftists. So it doesn't matter who you say cares about white people and who doesn't, when you label anyone who says they care about white people as people who by definition can't care about white people. Nope.
What are those fourteen words? Curious how they never say. Because they're innocuous...and correct.
Sure. Their primary concern is that it lends legitimacy to the claim that white people will cease to exist and white children are in danger. I wouldn't agree with that if it were 1978. White people as a racial construct are not going to simply die out, that's not really a thing. However, there is rampant, systemic, anti-white discrimination at this point that endangers white kids and teaches them to hate themselves.
The saying itself is not much of a problem. All the other crazy shit before and after it is, and more specifically, the idea that the best way to protect white people is with socialism; well that's a special case of retard.
Socialism didn't protect Russia, Germany, or Britain. Imagine being fucking retarded enough to think that therefore Socialism would protect white people, when Socialism is actively destroying white people right now.
Frankly, fuck their concerns. I'm not going to for a single minute take the arguments of people who absolutely despise "whiteness" when it comes to whether or not white people should look after themselves. It's a bit of a conflict of interests, I'd say.
It's like the people who take every single instance of anything as proof that climate change is real, and they should push the agendas they already wanted to push. Or the disarmament squad, who will take any event as a sign they need to push the gun control legislation they already wanted to push.
They're not reliable or trustworthy, so frankly their concerns when it comes to white people is beyond worthless.
I mean, I would have thought so too. Until you notice what they're doing to any and every "white majority" country (and I put that in quotes because they don't call black countries "black majority," or Asian countries "Asian majority," and the whole concept is a linguistic attack itself.) It's not going to be soon, but if white people aren't allowed to have anything for themselves, and any group of predominately or exclusively white people is deemed racist...over time, yes, "white people" will absolutely die out, or at least shrivel away to nothing. and once the numbers get low enough, probably get genocided actively even nearer to extinction. You just have to look at the trends to realize that, yes, white people are being shoved out, and that will at least potentially result in eventual near extinction.
And, if white people aren't allowed to have an identity, but every other racial group is, and they're mostly trained to hate white people...yeah, whites aren't faring too well in that scenario.
Tell them that.
Awwww shit, there you go again. One of my least favorite arguments. If you care about white people, you're a socialist and a leftist. Tiresome.
No one is calling for socialism. You just use that as a smear against people you don't like, to try to score cheap points. It's a shame, too. You're obviously a smart guy, and you're good on plenty of subjects. But this is just bullshit, and it annoys me every time you, and others using the same playbook, use that tactic.
If defending white people is socialism, what should white people do? Because you seem to just lump anything pro-white in with Nazism, and Nazism in with socialism (yeah, point, but it's a tad more complicated), and then with leftism. So basically, to you, any pro-white movement is inherently leftist, and thus inherently retarded. So do white people just die out, or what?
I'm a white person who cares about white people, and thinks they're under attack. What is an acceptable attitude or response?
No, this is Progressive Nationalist doctrine. Even in the worst case you can politically imagine, stateless peoples exist regardless of political recognition. That isn't even remotely going to come to that.
No, just the opposite. If your are a Leftist or a Socialist, then I know for a fact you don't care about American Whites. The same way a Feminist doesn't care about women, or a BLM activist doesn't care about American Blacks.
Open and immediate confrontation against racialist bullshit. That's what I've done, even at work, directly to people's faces. I make it clear that under no uncertain terms I will respond to racialism with direct, open, immediate hostility and condemnation regardless of consequence. I will not tolerate it, and will not tolerate it being pushed onto my co-workers, nor any member of my team.
You don't tolerate it, you don't compromise, you set the tempo of the battle and you start it early. "But you could lose your job!" Good. Don't work for racist, Nazi, trash. If you are a good employee, then they don't deserve you, and better people should earn your labor.
And yes, that includes these fucking Black National Socialist terrorists talking about "racial equity" and "social justice".
Beyond that, take care of your neighbors, family, friends, and local community. Be the pillar of your community. If you really want to effect positive change for American Whites, then you need to check out what Booker T. Washington did for American Blacks.
Your word salad gets exhausting.
And, again, I'm not trying to be mean, I don't dislike or disrespect you. I know you're a smart guy. I just thing you're on the wrong side of this, and disingenuous on this topic as well.
Stateless people exist...but not as any sort of power. Stateless people exist...at the mercy of the State.
Again, they're after white people, in every white location. I know you know this. Over time, that will result in white people fading out. In any nonwhite location, whites are the outsiders. In any white location...well, our own governments are turning against us steadily, we have affirmative action against us, we often have all but "No Whites Allowed" signs. If the trend continues, that doesn't leave us anywhere at all pleasant.
US went from +90% white to ~60% in around a century. Many other "white majority" (again, linguistic attack on white countries, no one else is a "majority" country, they're just an Asian or black country, or whatever) followed the same trend. All power structures are against whites. There is no pro-white group with power really anywhere in the world. Almost any country that went from majority white to minority white basically genocided the white people there.
To act like it's impossible that whites get driven to utter irrelevance and put to the mercy of people who have declared their hatred of us means you're either not paying attention (which I know isn't true), or just don't want to admit it.
Again, linguistics. You accuse anyone who says they're for white people of being socialist leftists. So it doesn't matter who you say cares about white people and who doesn't, when you label anyone who says they care about white people as people who by definition can't care about white people. Nope.