Mainly thinking about this because of some of the comments in this post here, but I do think while what we currently have right now is way too much regulation.
Some examples of 'good regulation' in my opinion would be the existence of drivers' licenses, 'right to repair' laws, the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and building codes.
While some notable 'bad regulation' is anything to do with 2A restrictions and the modern health care industry.
Overall, I'm just trying to gauge what is good vs bad regulation.
It isn't about too much or too little, it is about good vs bad for purpose.
Milk can't contain lead is good regulation, farmers can't sell properly labeled raw milk to whoever wants to buy it is bad regulation.
Your example of drivers licenses is actually an example of bad regulation. Because its one that only inconveniences the law abiding. Illegals and niggers drive without licenses all the time. And it really does nothing to ensure the quality of drivers. All it does is give the government leverage over mostly working class (White) men that can be used as a cudgel when the men do something that the city elites disapprove of, like missing child support payments or daring to drive themselves home from a bar.
Right to repair is only fixable by overhauling IP law which is something that is so convoluted I wouldn't trust any remotely relevant politician to touch because they are all retarded.
"health care" is broken first because in a low trust society you can't apply reasonableness tests to anything, and second because it is intentionally bolloxed up because the confusopoly benefits the insurance industry, the investor class, and their pet politicians.