Amy
(i.imgur.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
it's all the worst parts of religion, without any of the good parts.
pertaining to the actual question he asked
in most contexts, the answer to this is no. Given the group she is talking to, her response to this should have been
The way that they trap people is they ask them to affirm that thing X is a subset of thing Y. X is clearly defined in the context of the discussion ("trans women"="""former""" men who """transitioned""" to being women), but Y is not. it is purposely left nebulous so that The Listener projects whatever they want to project onto the conversation.
make them say out loud what they probably mean:
this way the cyclical nature of the definition comes out in the open, and their agenda becomes clear: to destroy the concept of "woman" and replace it with their own.