Not exactly.

If you look at how LA, NY, and Portland handle illegal immigration and homeless, one of the things they do is actually ship people back and forth from city to city over and over again. They literally request a huge swathe of people, then ask the feds for money as a stipend to "deal with the emergency influx", and then pocket that money and ship a swathe of people to the next city which does the same thing.

It's a human trafficking racket, so shipping illegals to blue cities and states has a monetary advantage rather than a political one.

Minnesota was already blue, but making a Somali colony in the state also helps. It could be an attack, but there's a multiplicity of reasons why some illegals are in some states and cities.

I'd be willing to bet that sending illegals to Ohio is less of an "attack", and is rather a mechanism of keeping Haitians out of ethnic conflict with other groups. Truth is, Somalis and Haitians are fucking notorious among other non-white ethnic groups due to crime and violence. This means that if you put 5,000 Haitians or Somalis in an American Black community, you're going to get a major upswing of violence and ethnict conflict between American Blacks and Carribean/African Blacks. This would weaken political control in that place. Same thing happens if you send them to Hispanic or Asian areas.

So, instead, they put them in white, rural, conservative communities because either a) no one cares what happens to fly-over gammon; b) the conservatives try deporting them and you can use it as an example of Republicans being evilwhiteracists.