Go to any of the Canadian Reddit forums for example that allow discussion and man, it's fuck the government, fuck immigrants, who do you think controls everything, etc... it's not what it was like 5 years ago.
Meanwhile on here it's like hello KIA2, I'd like to have a discussion on... Banned. DOM didn't like your haircut.
Interesting…what are your thoughts on the White Israelite theory and arguments in favor of natalist ideologies?
Irrelevant theory. Ideas like these are weapons. My thoughts are if the theory serves a purpose to the interest of White people then great if not then scrap it. The actual truth is entirely irrelevant. Just make up whatever theory you want to convince people to promote a good outcome for you and your people. All that matters is how useful the theory is and frankly it doesn't seem all that useful to me. Just controversial and requires a lot of history revision. We'd be better off to drop Christianity entirely and start fresh imo.
As for pro natalism. I think quality of offspring is more important than quantity of offspring. There's not much more to say than that. I can't stand White people who promote White Women worship by subjugating men to outright slavery at the behest of the State and/or women for the sake of having children for the sake of children themselves with no thought out into the quality of these children. However, I think people outright against children in any regard are equally as out to lunch. Have children but make sure the circumstances for children are such that any children you have will lead to a future positive impact on society as a whole not a detrimental one. I think at a civilization level resources should not be diverted toward people who have children. We should lower taxes to as close to 0% as possible, abolish all social programs, abolish child support, abolish alimony, make asset separation equal to what you bring in you get out and give men 100% default custody in separations. Ironically this would lead to an increase in quality children which is all that matters. Immigration should be put to 0 and outright banned.
Huh, you sound different from the other guy I knew who used 50+ (emphasis on the +) accounts to troll TD and post about christcucks on ConPro. Though your thoughts on the reduction of ideas to mere weapons interestingly echos him, I wonder if you guys are being pumped out by the same school-of-thought…
Doesn’t it worry you that by disregarding the truth you will inevitably select “the wrong” theories to promote, leading to potentially catastrophically negative outcomes? It seems to me that “truth” and “the right thing to do” are completely entwined in reality…I suppose you disagree?
Regarding immigration, absolutely. Along with all the “pseudo-legal” means they’ve been using over and above “net immigration rates”. In this example, you see how disregard for truth amongst the people who run our society (at the ground level made up of mostly gentiles) has led to disastrous consequences for society, due to the pursuit of perceived benefit. Think of everyone who has been convinced we “need” migrant labor to prop up the economy. Those people are genetically identical to you and I for the most part. The only thing that stands a chance at winning is truth, don’t you think?
I could be the same guy or not. I've been around since the beginning of the .win network on many different accounts.
The bans happen because mods change over time. What was allowed on TheDonald 5 years ago, isn't allowed today. What was allowed on ConPro isn't allowed today. Overtime, it seems mods on all communities are trying to keep discussion and exchange of ideas to a minimum.
I am not concerned about what is and isn't the truth because all ideas can be analyzed based on concrete outcomes of those ideas and I stick to what is concrete. I reject all ideas where the realization of the idea (positive outcome) is something intangible (spiritual, heaven, after death, future generations, etc...). The reward has to be now. Anything that is promised that can't be tangibly realized is done to lead people astray, that is the truth. It's pure manipulation. Any truth that sticks to this premise can be evaluated. If White people are the real Israelites, what does that do for you or I that is tangible? So what good is the idea? Can you convince people to follow you in order to create a better outcome using that idea? Then maybe the idea has value. If the only value in the idea is that because Whites are the real Israelites, you should just pray to God and God will fix everything eventually but not in your lifetime. That's an idea being used to enslave and manipulate you so it's a bad idea regardless of truth. The truth is that the actual truth behind any idea will benefit me and if it doesn't then it's in my interest to reject the truth anyway so that is what I will do. Ideas are there to serve my interests otherwise, I will reject them regardless of truth.
No, I think our leaders have aptly proven that truth is irrelevant and stands 0 chance at winning on its own. Power is what wins and with enough power you can craft any truth you want. Ideas can be used to manipulate others in order to increase one's power but any idea works for that regardless of the truth of the idea or not and that's ultimately all that matters is how useful then the idea is in providing power to your aims. When you're evaluating whether to believe an idea or not you shouldn't ask if the idea is true or not, you should ask how will the idea benefit me? If the idea can benefit you then it being true is irrelevant. If you ask whether the idea is true or not then you may believe a "true" idea that doesn't benefit you. If the idea doesn't benefit you why would you believe it regardless of truth? What good does believing a true idea do for you if the idea doesn't benefit you, so why believe it whether it's true or not?
What is it that is banned on ConPro? It seems like they just cracked down on malicious actors who forum slid or started shit with everybody. Am I missing something?
From this glimpse past the facade (which I appreciate), I see a man ground down to spiritual nihilism, leading to a kind of economic materialist world view which includes ideas within that economic materialism. Do you outright reject the “spiritual” nature/aspect of existence? It sounds like you do, and I would suggest that is perhaps neutering the wholistic potential of your perspective.
Just to use our current interaction as an example of my point about truth being the only path to defeating deception, look at how fragile your power actually is. Once the truth about multiple accounts comes out (which again, I appreciate, for the truth of admitting it at the start, and I suppose here for its illustrative purposes), your power erodes. Logically, when ultimate truth is revealed, it is the only thing capable of eroding the power of ultimate evil, and thus logically since it happens at both sides of the spectrum (our tiny and insignificant evil here, of using multiple accounts and, presumably astroturfing them to appear “more popular” - given your mercenary approach to ideas themselves - and the hypothetical though logically existant “ultimate evil”), it also applies throughout the spectrum as well.
Just like you can’t cure a wound by causing more harm, I don’t see how more lies could ever beat older and stronger lies.
I’d be interested in your thoughts on this short piece, I think it actually gets to the crux of this discussion quite nicely:
https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/16ZqrZF5AW/existence-is-a-game-that-everyth/c