I thought the reason why Brits use "Asian" to refer to pajeets rather than slants is because they simply have way more pajeets than slants, whereas Americans use "Asian" to refer to slants because we have way more slants than we have pajeets.
Nah, older Brits used to call them Indians and Pakistanis, or heaven forbid- Paki's.
But then the "That's racist" brigade happened much earlier in the UK and they all merged into "Asian", similar to how much later on in the US black got merged into the "PoC" blob, so you can't describe any specific group's failings anymore. The UK is just like ten years deeper down the rabbit hole than the US.
No, it was a government op to refer to pajeets as Asians in order to hide them among the rest. Asian gangs could be Muslims, Indians, Chinese. Indian gangs is obvious. Muslim gangs is obvious. That's why they use Asian to hide what's truly going on.
I thought the reason why Brits use "Asian" to refer to pajeets rather than slants is because they simply have way more pajeets than slants, whereas Americans use "Asian" to refer to slants because we have way more slants than we have pajeets.
Asians are respected by Whites, so the UK government calls Pakistani Asians to present them as respectful.
Nah, older Brits used to call them Indians and Pakistanis, or heaven forbid- Paki's.
But then the "That's racist" brigade happened much earlier in the UK and they all merged into "Asian", similar to how much later on in the US black got merged into the "PoC" blob, so you can't describe any specific group's failings anymore. The UK is just like ten years deeper down the rabbit hole than the US.
No, it was a government op to refer to pajeets as Asians in order to hide them among the rest. Asian gangs could be Muslims, Indians, Chinese. Indian gangs is obvious. Muslim gangs is obvious. That's why they use Asian to hide what's truly going on.