hoo boy this might be long.... i think i will limit it to four.
1 sandbag corpo's/wealthy in court procedings trials involving them get the following applyed to them, they get a court appointed attorney reasonably fresh from law shcool (cut off 2-4 years), they cannot instruct the attorny beyond the start of the suit and must have no contact with them outside of the courtroom in public or private, lastly 1 month time limit to provent bankruptcy as goal. reasoning for this is to a limit the effectiveness of lawfare tactics and b an attempt to stop larger groups from just moneybaging their way to victory knowing they can just bankrupt their target with their vast resources.
2 copyright reform, throw all of the god damn disney crap into the nearst incenorator where it belongs. 70 plus years after the authors death is absurd it should be a flat 25, also a use it or loose it clause added to all copyrighted works and patents no more of this ea style hoovering up ip/patents and then squatting on it that harms the creative ecosystem and enable patent trolling fail this it goes public domain... speaking of harm scuttle the dmca while your at it.
3 term limits, judges should be rotated out every year (unless they are soctus) with a max of 3 terms this is an attempt to limit judical corruption with a revolving door aproach it will make bribery impractical.
4 jury improvments, the jury should be required to take, at state expense. a civics remedial course with case law examples included... said course must promently feature the concept of jury nullification as well. the jurior position also must pay the person stuck in it their standard hourly wage at time and a half if apllicable. if not they will recive min wage rates non taxable in both cases. this is an attempt to prevent filtering out juriors who know of jury nullification as well as an attempt to make it less likely for people to skip jury duty if selected.
none of these are great really but thats where i would start.
If you want to copyright a work, you pay $1 to the national copyright registry and submit a copy of the work for comparison purposes.
Each year you renew, the cost doubles. After ten years, this is only around $500, which is reasonable if you're making modest profit.
By year 25, it's around $16 million, and only worthwhile for the biggest properties.
This severely discourages copyright squatting and creates a self-financing regulatory body which can actually produce what is copywritten for comparison in lawsuits.
hoo boy this might be long.... i think i will limit it to four.
1 sandbag corpo's/wealthy in court procedings trials involving them get the following applyed to them, they get a court appointed attorney reasonably fresh from law shcool (cut off 2-4 years), they cannot instruct the attorny beyond the start of the suit and must have no contact with them outside of the courtroom in public or private, lastly 1 month time limit to provent bankruptcy as goal. reasoning for this is to a limit the effectiveness of lawfare tactics and b an attempt to stop larger groups from just moneybaging their way to victory knowing they can just bankrupt their target with their vast resources.
2 copyright reform, throw all of the god damn disney crap into the nearst incenorator where it belongs. 70 plus years after the authors death is absurd it should be a flat 25, also a use it or loose it clause added to all copyrighted works and patents no more of this ea style hoovering up ip/patents and then squatting on it that harms the creative ecosystem and enable patent trolling fail this it goes public domain... speaking of harm scuttle the dmca while your at it.
3 term limits, judges should be rotated out every year (unless they are soctus) with a max of 3 terms this is an attempt to limit judical corruption with a revolving door aproach it will make bribery impractical.
4 jury improvments, the jury should be required to take, at state expense. a civics remedial course with case law examples included... said course must promently feature the concept of jury nullification as well. the jurior position also must pay the person stuck in it their standard hourly wage at time and a half if apllicable. if not they will recive min wage rates non taxable in both cases. this is an attempt to prevent filtering out juriors who know of jury nullification as well as an attempt to make it less likely for people to skip jury duty if selected.
none of these are great really but thats where i would start.
One idea I like is progressive copyright fees.
If you want to copyright a work, you pay $1 to the national copyright registry and submit a copy of the work for comparison purposes.
Each year you renew, the cost doubles. After ten years, this is only around $500, which is reasonable if you're making modest profit.
By year 25, it's around $16 million, and only worthwhile for the biggest properties.
This severely discourages copyright squatting and creates a self-financing regulatory body which can actually produce what is copywritten for comparison in lawsuits.
great idea. and where its self regulating like that its corruption resistant.