If this theory were correct, Jesus would be a liar.
I don't read these gnostic ideas in the tanahk and I try to read what Jesus read as well as the other inspired works of God. (I can glean what He read by what He said, just like I can with authors like Lewis) Doesn't it take a greater jump to imagine the Lord's mind instead of reading what He actually wishes to share with you, the pieces of His mind I mean as well as His nature.
Anything can be misunderstood if you don't know the person behind the words.
To be honest, this idea goes against the nature of who He is and I find it disappointing, even as a thought experiment it does a disservice to Him.
Check that video I edited into the first paragraph for an idea of the archeological evidence.
I don’t really see how “if this theory were correct, Jesus would be a liar”? - like you point out, so much is up to interpretation. Surely an interpretation of the Old Testament exists in which this is the case and Jesus is still Jesus. In fact, that is demonstrated by the many sects of Gnostic Christians who the Roman Catholic Church had to eradicate. Have you ever heard of the Cathars?
I like archealogy so I might see the video, thanks.
I actually think it's dangerous to misinterpret God and the bible, and because I'm a very 'something', I've fretted diligently with the Lord for as long as I've been conscious about the nature of Him and me and the world.
God either is or isn't, there is no interpretation and if anyone has wonders and anything, He is taking questions.
God either is or isn't, there is no interpretation and if anyone has wonders and anything, He is taking questions.
”religion is like a walking stick. When you are young, you need help from your parents to walk. When you are old, you need a cane. When you are a healthy adult, you have no need for a cane; if you try to run, it will only hinder you."
It's not like we have any reliable, original, verbatim documentation of anything Jesus ever said, all we have are conflicting accounts which paraphrase what he allegedly claimed.
If this theory were correct, Jesus would be a liar.
I don't read these gnostic ideas in the tanahk and I try to read what Jesus read as well as the other inspired works of God. (I can glean what He read by what He said, just like I can with authors like Lewis) Doesn't it take a greater jump to imagine the Lord's mind instead of reading what He actually wishes to share with you, the pieces of His mind I mean as well as His nature.
Anything can be misunderstood if you don't know the person behind the words.
To be honest, this idea goes against the nature of who He is and I find it disappointing, even as a thought experiment it does a disservice to Him.
Check that video I edited into the first paragraph for an idea of the archeological evidence.
I don’t really see how “if this theory were correct, Jesus would be a liar”? - like you point out, so much is up to interpretation. Surely an interpretation of the Old Testament exists in which this is the case and Jesus is still Jesus. In fact, that is demonstrated by the many sects of Gnostic Christians who the Roman Catholic Church had to eradicate. Have you ever heard of the Cathars?
I like archealogy so I might see the video, thanks. I actually think it's dangerous to misinterpret God and the bible, and because I'm a very 'something', I've fretted diligently with the Lord for as long as I've been conscious about the nature of Him and me and the world.
God either is or isn't, there is no interpretation and if anyone has wonders and anything, He is taking questions.
Edit: I've heard of the Cathars
”religion is like a walking stick. When you are young, you need help from your parents to walk. When you are old, you need a cane. When you are a healthy adult, you have no need for a cane; if you try to run, it will only hinder you."
I agree about growing in knowledge and longsuffering without answers.
https://soc.culture.singapore.narkive.com/Jsd4lX2t/meeting-with-god-experiences-told-by-a-living-taoist-immortal
It's not like we have any reliable, original, verbatim documentation of anything Jesus ever said, all we have are conflicting accounts which paraphrase what he allegedly claimed.
For me, I had to decide that either God is who He says He is or He's a total lunatic and liar to boot.