Nice Jesus: When Anon gets it Right
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
Suppose you catch your teenage daughter stealing money from your wife's purse.
You ground her until she apologizes. If she doesn't apologize, then she stays grounded. If she apologizes, she gets to do some chores to remind her that stealing has consequences and to show her penitence.
Does this mean you don't love your daughter? Of course not. A lack of love would be to permit the aberrant behavior, to enable it and to fail on your duty to guide and correct your children.
Freaks bastardize even the words they speak, blasphemously proclaiming that "love" requires you to tolerate and enable their behavior. Those are the words of the serpent, a satanic inversion of what is true and just.
"Love" is a pretty poor word. The issue is that every twat born after Marx in the Anglosphere latched onto "love." Our entire global politics is based on "love."
Of course. The propensity of the enemy to invert is especially present in language.
That's why every inch is worth fighting for. Because you don't know what the proverbial mile is behind it. It's why "conservatism" is a false ideology that leads only to failure, an ideology of constant retreat.
I was raised in a mid-90s evangelical church. It kindda sucked for me because it was all personal prophesy and scriptural interpretation. It wasn't their fault, but a sect based on every last dude's interpretation is hard. To over-simplify, I was 30 before I learned Christianity had a 2 millennia history of moral theory.
What really hit me hard after my Confirmation, was that ideas like "Satanic inversion" didn't seem as far fetched as I remember as a kid in a Evangelical church. That was probably because I had read fucking Foucault who liked to fuck slave boys and had a large influence on modern ideas of sexuality.
My personal discovery of the rot, so to speak, was the revelation that an enormous amount of the SFF author community were hardcore pedophile cultists.
I encourage everyone to read The Last Closet.
The fact that we use only one word to describe multiple, complex concepts has ruined it. Philia, Agape, Eros, we all know what the terms described mean, but then everything gets lumped into one, basic "Love is love" which muddies the waters beyond recognition.
Love is actually a good word, the issue is that it has been bastardized. Love is best understood as the sacral nature of your duty of care towards another.
This is why in the marriage vows, God's love for the church, and the church's love for God are understood as "love", as an obligation that each have to one another, and the sacredness of them.
None of our global politics is based on love. These terms are intentionally re-defined.
When the Left use the term "Love" they mean: enabling.