Could be the curse of being an 'observer', those that are near big events but not directly tied to them.
Out of ALL the shit that's getting brought up with this assassination attempt, I'm actually willing to believe this is just one if those weird motherfuckers that has that luck you read about in history a lot.
For sure, and most of these weird things have a plausible enough explanation in a vacuum.
Similar to 9/11 though it’s the absurd accumulation of coincidences that gets harder and harder to dismiss as mere coincidence. Speaking of 9/11, a Blackrock subsidiary is being reported as having shorted $DJT to an inexplicable degree the day before the shooting, just like happened to multiple airlines immediately prior to 9/11
I don't think it's a coincidence that the guy that NYT pays to take pictures of presidents at their events happens to have pictures of them at events. How many thousands of pictures of presidents doing normal shit this guy takes doesn't get noticed?
Also, those settings aren't actually that weird, that's what the settings his camera uses when doing burst mode which is what most photographers use since they have way more storage than ever in the same form factor.
If you think they let the NYT into their little conspiracy you're a moron. Conspiracies only work if the group conspiring is kept small. The number one reason that 9/11 wasn't done by tye government is because it would require way too many people in the government to be involved for us not to have found out by now.
MkUltra was kept secret for so long only because it was a small group wholly within the CIA running the show. You don't bring outsiders into it unless you want to he caught.
I'm not a retard, if a simple explanation exists that doesn't involve shit with no evidence outside of "this guy was at two major events involving the same kind of people" it's not evidence of a conspiracy.
Could be the curse of being an 'observer', those that are near big events but not directly tied to them.
Out of ALL the shit that's getting brought up with this assassination attempt, I'm actually willing to believe this is just one if those weird motherfuckers that has that luck you read about in history a lot.
For sure, and most of these weird things have a plausible enough explanation in a vacuum.
Similar to 9/11 though it’s the absurd accumulation of coincidences that gets harder and harder to dismiss as mere coincidence. Speaking of 9/11, a Blackrock subsidiary is being reported as having shorted $DJT to an inexplicable degree the day before the shooting, just like happened to multiple airlines immediately prior to 9/11
Forgive the tangent lol
I don't think it's a coincidence that the guy that NYT pays to take pictures of presidents at their events happens to have pictures of them at events. How many thousands of pictures of presidents doing normal shit this guy takes doesn't get noticed?
Also, those settings aren't actually that weird, that's what the settings his camera uses when doing burst mode which is what most photographers use since they have way more storage than ever in the same form factor.
Yeah but you don’t think anything is a conspiracy, you’re a Normie’s normie
If you think they let the NYT into their little conspiracy you're a moron. Conspiracies only work if the group conspiring is kept small. The number one reason that 9/11 wasn't done by tye government is because it would require way too many people in the government to be involved for us not to have found out by now.
MkUltra was kept secret for so long only because it was a small group wholly within the CIA running the show. You don't bring outsiders into it unless you want to he caught.
I'm not a retard, if a simple explanation exists that doesn't involve shit with no evidence outside of "this guy was at two major events involving the same kind of people" it's not evidence of a conspiracy.