They got lucky with that game being the streamers game of the week, they're smart to cash out on a half finished pokemon rip off, It's not really a strong ip and it's unlikely they'll be able to top that with subsequent games.
Yeah, people are treating this like some grand betrayal by some superhero, when its almost certainly them taking the sale at the top of their value knowing full well they will never reach it again.
And unless they retroactively censor the game (possible, but not certainty) then you just need to not play their next one to avoid the cancer. They aren't some established company with dozens of beloved IPs now being lost.
Undoubtedly they got bags and bags of money, so stupid if they actually liked their product and wanted a future for it. Maybe not as much otherwise.
They got lucky with that game being the streamers game of the week, they're smart to cash out on a half finished pokemon rip off, It's not really a strong ip and it's unlikely they'll be able to top that with subsequent games.
Yeah, people are treating this like some grand betrayal by some superhero, when its almost certainly them taking the sale at the top of their value knowing full well they will never reach it again.
And unless they retroactively censor the game (possible, but not certainty) then you just need to not play their next one to avoid the cancer. They aren't some established company with dozens of beloved IPs now being lost.
Purely-in for the cash or not, Palworld is a ''you get plenty for what you paied'' deal.
Soyny wil degrade quality from now on.
I can lament the devs selling-out, but frankly I'd probably say yes to a fat pile of cash in exchange for my project videogame.
It's not like there was a shortage of good independant games. If the devs sell-out, move-on to the next independant game.