It's a Heisenberg theory: it's right or wrong depending on whether you say that it's good or bad.
Same as the Heisenberg elections held by the US: they are the most secure in the 250,000 years and fraud is impossible if Democrats win, or Russia stole it if Republicans win.
It’s gotten to a point where no amount of evidence for or against something matters at all. If the story is good for their side, they endorse it. If it’s bad for them, they deny or ignore it. I know lefties who were calling the shooting a hoax less than an hour after it happened. They saw it on live television. They know it makes zero sense to endanger yourself in a false flag. But they still prefer the 1% story to the 99% story, so that’s what it is.
Can a leftist explain how this theory is wrong?
It's a Heisenberg theory: it's right or wrong depending on whether you say that it's good or bad.
Same as the Heisenberg elections held by the US: they are the most secure in the 250,000 years and fraud is impossible if Democrats win, or Russia stole it if Republicans win.
I've seen that called celebration parallex.
It’s gotten to a point where no amount of evidence for or against something matters at all. If the story is good for their side, they endorse it. If it’s bad for them, they deny or ignore it. I know lefties who were calling the shooting a hoax less than an hour after it happened. They saw it on live television. They know it makes zero sense to endanger yourself in a false flag. But they still prefer the 1% story to the 99% story, so that’s what it is.